Video: Knock on Wood| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice
fa-facebookfa-linkedinfa-youtube-playfa-rss

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Lupus Nephritis
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

Epratuzumab May Work for SLE Subgroups

Larry Beresford  |  Issue: July 2018  |  July 19, 2018

Lupus is not believed to arise from a single pathogenesis mechanism, and multiple factors—including high placebo response, presence of the disease in different parts of the body and prescribing excessive corticosteroids or immunosuppressive drugs—may further challenge the clinical trial pathway for SLE.7

Significant Improvements

Dr. Gottenberg tells The Rheumatologist that his group analyzed subgroups of SLE patients that could respond to epratuzumab, taking advantage of the variety of research data, including assessment of antibodies, in the EMBODY database. The team identified 113 patients (13% of the EMBODY SLE population) whose medical history included a diagnosis of Sjögren’s and who were positive for the anti-SS-A/Ro extractable nuclear antigen, linked to both SLE and SLE associated with Sjögren’s.

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Their analysis found a higher proportion of SLE patients with Sjögren’s who received epratuzumab responded to treatment according to the BILAG-Based Composite Lupus Assessment (BICLA) of disease activity, which draws on the British Isles Lupus Assessment Group disease activity index.8 Results also included a 30–40% reduction in the number of B cells in the blood. “For the first time, a significant improvement was observed for a subset of SLE patients treated with epratuzumab,” he says, emphasizing this study was a post-hoc analysis. “This is an interesting result, pointing to a general strategy of treating lupus or Sjögren’s syndrome by targeting B cells,” he says.

“There is a need to confirm the results via randomized controlled trials,” Dr. Gottenberg says. He is unaware of any trials underway to examine the effectiveness of epratuzumab.

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

A recent summary of seven clinical trials investigating the efficacy and safety of epratuzumab in SLE underscores opportunities for subgroups, such as Sjögren’s patients, as well as the need for further research to explore other potential subgroups that might respond.9 Another open trial study of epratuzumab in primary Sjögren’s produced similar effects—including a 30% reduction in B cell count and clinical improvements in disease, although it only involved 16 patients.10

The data suggest that epratuzumab may have clinical benefits in certain subsets of SLE patients, pointing to the importance of patient stratification for research in this area. “We may find other subgroups of lupus patients where targeting B cells may be useful,” Dr. Gottenberg said. Small and preliminary studies targeting different subgroups could show positive results whereas big lupus trials with mixed patient populations tend to produce negative results and disappointment. There may also be implications for primary Sjögren’s, as well.

The key message for rheumatologists, Dr. Gottenberg says, is that B cells remain a relevant target in autoimmune diseases.

Page: 1 2 3 | Single Page
Share: 

Filed under:ConditionsSjögren’s DiseaseSystemic Lupus Erythematosus Tagged with:epratuzumabLymphoCideSjogren's

Related Articles

    Epratuzumab Results Disappointing, but Adalimumab Promising

    August 19, 2015

    Two Phase 3 trials have shown that epratuzumab did not meet its primary endpoints for treating SLE. Meanwhile, a Phase 3 study has shown adalimumab is effective for treating enthesitis-related arthritis in juveniles…

    Systemic Sjögrens: More Than a Sicca Disease

    November 1, 2014

    Differences in its epidemiologic, clinical and immunologic features underscore need for a homogeneous diagnostic and therapeutic approach

    T Cells in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

    August 1, 2011

    Progress toward targeted therapy

    In Green / shutterstock.com

    Sjögren’s Syndrome in Kids: Diagnostic Challenges & Treatment Options

    January 17, 2020

    A 14-year-old girl is referred to your office for fatigue and arthralgias. While you’re obtaining her past medical history, she divulges that she has had four episodes of bilateral parotitis, each lasting two weeks. An otolaryngologist evaluated her. She lacked sicca symptoms, had a normal complete blood count (CBC), normal inflammatory markers and a negative…

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
fa-facebookfa-linkedinfa-youtube-playfa-rss
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences