Video: Every Case Tells a Story| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

Evidence of Things Not Seen: The Match, Vienna & Unknown Unknowns

Philip Seo, MD, MHS  |  Issue: August 2022  |  August 13, 2022

Dr. Semmelweis concluded the medical students must be carrying cadaverous particles on their hands, which they subsequently brought with them to the maternity wards. These cadaverous particles induced puerperal fever in their patients. He came to this conclusion over a decade before Louis Pasteur proposed his germ theory of disease, in which microorganisms were found to be the cause of puerperal fever.10 Dr. Semmelweis had no proof these microorganisms existed. He concluded they must exist through his application of Škoda’s method of exclusion, which left no other possibility.

Beyond Exclusion

Michael Putman, MD, and Anisha Dua, MD, MPH, argue that enough is enough.

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

In their recent editorial, titled “There Is No Diagnosis of Exclusion in Rheumatology,” they aver:11

Like other ‘pseudo-probabilistic aphorisms,’ the phrase ‘diagnosis of exclusion’ suggests a preceding thoughtful diagnostic evaluation … . But should it? In our experience, a ‘diagnosis of exclusion’ is subjective and conditional, which misaligns it with principles of diagnostic reasoning, resulting in unnecessary testing and premature closure … . Such lists are subjective because a list of exclusions depends upon a combination of prior experience, cognitive dispositions, and physician biases, which vary greatly from rheumatologist to rheumatologist. They are conditional because they depend upon the patient’s presentation … . Even in cases where the ‘diagnosis of exclusion’ framework has resulted in an adequate workup, it closes the imagination to reasonable future possibilities.

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

They have a point. I think the main problem with diagnoses of exclusion, however, lies less with the concept and more with its sloppy use.

When I was a medical student, I owned a pocket book called Differential Diagnosis. For every chief complaint, the book had a list of diagnoses that needed to be considered, which I dutifully copied into my admission note, along with a brief statement as to how each diagnosis was excluded.

Dr. Škoda would have been horrified.

For him, his method of exclusion was not a Gedankenexperiment; diagnoses needed to be made at the bedside, supported by a scrupulous examination of the patient, rather than by reviewing a checklist of possibilities. Also, because making a clinical diagnosis is fraught, a diagnosis of exclusion must always be treated as a hypothesis, rather than the last word. In its ideal form, the method of exclusion opens the imagination to less common possibilities, like the existence of a hypothetical particle that medical students carried from the morgue to the obstetrical wards.

Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 | Single Page
Share: 

Filed under:OpinionRheuminationsSpeak Out Rheum Tagged with:DiagnosisexclusionMatchresidency

Related Articles
    Corona Borealis Studio / shutterstock.com

    The Reliability & Utility of Serological Antibody Tests in COVID-19

    September 11, 2020

    Serological testing for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) antibodies may play a critical role in the management of the worldwide health crisis. Such testing may reveal key information for epidemiology, convalescent plasma therapies and vaccine development. However, the situation is complex, and much is unknown. Although such testing may ultimately be used to…

    Serological Antibody Tests in COVID-19: Test Reliability and Utility

    June 10, 2020

    Serological testing for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) antibodies may play a critical role in the management of the worldwide health crisis. Such testing may reveal key information for epidemiology, convalescent plasma therapies and vaccine development. However, the situation is complex, and much is unknown. Although such testing may ultimately be used to…

    A Live Patient Experience in Medical School Can Boost Interest in, and Knowledge of, Rheumatology

    July 9, 2023

    After intense academic classroom studies, University of Nebraska College of Medicine students in Omaha are able to put what they are learning in practice through the university’s Live Patient Experience (LPE) program, led by the Division of Rheumatology and Immunology. The LPE gives students real-life experience with patients and can serve as motivation to consider…

    Antiphospholipid Antibody Testing Update

    January 13, 2012

    Successes, challenges, and controversies of diagnostic methods for APS

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences