Video: Every Case Tells a Story| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

FDA Approves Denosumab for Glucocorticoid-Induced Osteoporosis

Michele B. Kaufman, PharmD, BCGP  |  June 11, 2018

In May, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved denosumab (Prolia) for treating glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis (GIOP) in adult men and women with a high risk of fracture.1 High fracture risk is defined as a history of osteoporotic fracture, multiple risk factors for fracture or patients who have failed or are intolerant to other available osteoporosis therapy. This FDA approval is based on data that showed adult patients receiving glucocorticoids who also received denosumab had greater increases in bone mineral density (BMD) than patients who received risedronate as an active comparator.2

The study was a phase 3, 12-month primary analysis of a 24-month randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, active-controlled study (N=795). The efficacy and safety of 60 mg subcutaneous denosumab given every six months was compared with 5 mg oral risedronate given once daily. Patients also received at least 7.5 mg/day of oral prednisone (or equivalent). The study included two patient groups. Patients in the glucocorticoid-initiating group were receiving glucocorticoid treatment for less than three months prior to the study and were planning to receive glucocorticoids for at least six months. Patients in the glucocorticoid-continuing group were receiving glucocorticoids for a minimum of three months prior to the study and were planning to receive glucocorticoids for at least six months.

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

In the glucocorticoid-continuing group, denosumab treatment showed a significantly greater lumbar spine BMD increase than the risedronate-treated patients at Year 1 (3.8% vs. 0.8%, respectively). The treatment difference was 2.9% (P<0.001). Additionally, in the glucocorticoid-initiating group, denosumab treatment showed a significantly greater lumbar spine BMD increase vs. risedronate-treated patients at Year 1 (4.4% vs. 2.3%, respectively). The treatment difference was 2.2% (P<0.001). The effects on the lumbar spine BMD were consistent without regard to patient gender, race, geographic region, menopausal status, baseline age, lumbar spine BMD T score and/or glucocorticoid dose within the groups.

During the study, no new safety signals were identified. The most common adverse reactions were back pain, bronchitis, headache and hypertension. Atypical femoral fracture was reported in one denosumab-treated patient. No cases of osteonecrosis of the jaw were reported. Serious infections were reported in 3.9% (n=15) of risedronate-treated patients and 4.3% (n= 17) of denosumab-treated patients. Dermal and epidermal dermal adverse events, such as dermatitis, eczema and rashes, were reported in 4.2% (n=16) of risedronate-treated patients and 3.8% (n=15) of denosumab-treated patients.

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Michele B. Kaufman, PharmD, BCGP, is a freelance medical writer based in New York City and a pharmacist at New York Presbyterian Lower Manhattan Hospital.

Page: 1 2 | Single Page
Share: 

Filed under:ConditionsDrug UpdatesOsteoarthritis and Bone Disorders Tagged with:denosumabFDAGlucocorticoid-Induced OsteoporosisOsteoporosisosteoporosis treatmentsU.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)

Related Articles

    Denosumab May Work Better Than Risedronate for Steroid-Induced Osteoporosis

    April 26, 2018

    NEW YORK (Reuters Health)—The RANKL inhibitor denosumab is superior to the bisphosphonate risedronate in increasing bone-mineral density (BMD) at the lumbar spine in patients just starting or continuing steroid therapy, according to 12-month results of a 24-month randomized controlled study. “Glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis is the most common form of secondary osteoporosis and increases the risk of…

    Build Up Bone

    June 1, 2007

    Current management of osteoporosis

    Improving Bone Mineral Density: Risedronate vs. Denosumab

    March 2, 2022

    Treatment with denosumab for patients with RA and glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis led to greater increases in bone mineral density of the lumbar spine and hips of patients than treatment with risedronate.

    Denosumab Is Effective for Glucocorticoid-Induced Osteoporosis

    May 15, 2018

    A study identified denosumab as a useful treatment for patients initiating or continuing glucocorticoids who are at risk for fractures. Denosumab had clinical effects similar to risedronate but was more effective than risedronate in the improvement of bone mineral density at the lumbar spine…

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences