Video: Every Case Tells a Story| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

Funding Sources for Scientific Discovery, Medical Research

Simon M. Helfgott, MD  |  Issue: March 2017  |  March 20, 2017

Simultaneously, a third form of philanthropic organization emerged, private foundations, such as the Rockefeller, Carnegie, Commonwealth, W.K. Kellogg and Kresge foundations, that were endowed by some of the wealthiest American families. The long-term guarantee of income enabled foundations to concentrate on a broader range of issues than the narrow focus of local charities or of the single-disease-oriented national health agencies.

The Rockefeller Foundation, which was established in 1909 with the proceeds of 73,000 shares of stock in the Standard Oil Co., helped establish the University of Chicago, the schools of public health at Johns Hopkins in Baltimore and at Harvard in Boston, the Montreal Neurological Institute, the eponymously named research university in Manhattan and countless other research facilities.

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Foundations were critical for establishing the infrastructure of medical research by providing nearly as much financial support as governmental agencies. Private philanthropy’s dominance peaked prior to the start of World War II, but began to wane after the war as the growth of public confidence in medical research created a heightened demand for more public financial support for the medical sciences.7

Some wealthy donors took this cue and focused their giving on providing funding to creating research programs rather than constructing magnificent research edifices and hospital wings bearing their names. A case in point is the medical institute bearing the name of the late, reclusive billionaire, Howard Hughes, that was established in 1953 (HHMI).8

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

A unique feature of the HHMI is that it employs those talented investigators selected as awardees but who conduct their research in the laboratories of their host institutions. Mr. Hughes had amassed a fortune, derived primarily from the profits of his aircraft company, and bequeathed his shares to his institute. But his eccentric behavior, living in near complete seclusion in his final years and the discovery at the time of his death of competing wills resulted in many legal challenges to his bequest. Eventually, it was upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court, allowing for the transfer of the $5.2 billion proceeds to the HHMI.9

The Gigaphilanthropists

Although the NIH maintains its dominant role in funding medical research, the rising costs of funding new technology, coupled with the budgetary gridlock so often gripping Congress, require robust, alternative sources of support. Thankfully the tradition of philanthropy in the U.S. lives on.

Once again, private foundations have emerged as key financial supporters for research. The benefits for donors interested in medical research include the freedom to think boldly, pursue unconventional hypotheses, support orphan conditions and fund whomever they choose, including early-career investigators.10 In addition, private support unshackles investigators, who work across borders, from the onerous paperwork required by taxpayer-funded sources.

Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 | Single Page
Share: 

Filed under:OpinionResearch RheumRheuminationsSpeak Out Rheum Tagged with:discoveryfinancialFundinginvestmentmedicalNational Institutes of HealthPhilanthropyResearchrheumatologysupport

Related Articles

    The Non-Linear Path of Discovery, & Publicly Funded Research

    November 19, 2018

    Black powder was initially developed in 9th century China, by Taoists searching for the philosopher’s stone, which fans of Harry Potter will remember is the talisman that grants eternal life. The Chinese name for black powder literally translates as fire medicine. The chemical composition of black powder was first recorded in China during the 11th…

    Funding Crisis Threatens Research and Training in Rheumatology

    October 1, 2014

    The ACR and Rheumatology Research Foundation present data to reinforce importance of supporting rheumatology research

    The ACR, Rheumatology Research Foundation Address Research Funding Shortfall

    July 14, 2015

    I have spent my entire academic career as a clinical investigator and have grown to recognize the importance of a strong and vibrant rheumatology workforce. However, I am deeply concerned about our ability as a subspecialty to sustain our research enterprise and take advantage of the modern breakthroughs in science. The reduction in federal funding…

    Tear Down That Wall: CME restrictions stifle speeches

    August 1, 2010

    The Nobel Peace Prize is one of the most prestigious awards in the world because it recognizes individuals and organizations that promote the causes of peace and human rights. In 1991, Aung San Suu Kyi received this prize for her courageous work in advancing democracy in the Republic of Myanmar. Because of her leadership of the democracy movement in Myanmar, the military regime that governs that country has gone to great lengths to gag her. Indeed, she has been under house arrest for most of the last two decades since she received the Peace Prize. An outpouring of support for Aung San Suu Kyi and demands for her freedom by human rights advocates and Western governments have sadly been to no avail.

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences