Video: Every Case Tells a Story| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

Give Them Time: 3 Tips for Using Time with Patients to Aid Shared Decision Making

Carina Stanton  |  August 27, 2019

“We know clinician–patient exchanges become more interactive when clinicians ask open questions and allow silence, so that patients are encouraged to provide their views [rather than just saying yes or no],” Dr. Pieterse says. “A key characteristic of this encounter is for the physician to be curious about this individual patient and motivated to learn more about this patient’s situation, needs and desires.”

Some clinicians and rheumatologists may question the value of re-evaluating the schedule and format of patient encounters to encourage more effective decision making and connection. Often, clinicians say there is no time for involving patients in decision making, but Dr. Pieterse asks what is it for which there is too little time? Only if rheumatologists have insight into when time is lacking and for what it is lacking will they be able to create time that will effectively involve the patient, she says.

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

“Rheumatologists need to become clear on the situations and cases in which they would really want the patient to be involved, and then find out when time is too short and when time can be saved,” Dr. Pieterse says.

This approach doesn’t mean a rheumatologist’s workload should be transferred to the patient, she notes. Example: Some practices have patients prepare for a visit by reading information ahead of time, so the clinician does not need to explain it. This approach may be helpful, but may not be a patient-centered approach.

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Dr. Pieterse says, “Understanding the situations in which more or less time is needed with clinical encounters means physicians and their patients work to understand how time could be better distributed over the decision-making process.”


Carina Stanton is a freelance science journalist based in Denver.

References

  1. Bomhof-Roordink H, Fischer MJ, van Duijn-Bakker N, et al. Shared decision making in oncology: A model based on patients’, healthcare professionals’ and researchers’ views. Psychooncology. 2019 Jan;28(1):139–146. Epub 2018 Nov 8.
  2. Pieterse AH, Stiggelbout AM, Montori VM. Shared decision making and the importance of time. JAMA. 2019 Apr 19.
  3. Joseph-Williams N, Elwyn G, Edwards A. Knowledge is not power for patients: A systematic review and thematic synthesis of patient-reported barriers and facilitators to shared decision making. Patient Educ Couns. 2014 March;94(3):291–309.
  4. Légaré F, Ratté S, Gravel K, Graham ID. Barriers and facilitators to implementing shared decision making in clinical practice: Update of a systematic review of health professionals’ perceptions. Patient Educ Couns. 2008 Dec;73(3):526–535.

Page: 1 2 | Single Page
Share: 

Filed under:Practice Support Tagged with:patient carePractice Managementshared decision makingtime

Related Articles

    Why & How to Pursue Shared Decision Making with Your Patients

    June 21, 2018

    Over the past several decades, the medical community has been moving toward a model of shared decision making. In addition to its ethical advantages, shared decision making potentially yields such benefits as improved medical adherence and better health outcomes. With the proliferation of treatment options and changes in the larger culture, shared decision making is…

    Why & How Doctors Should Foster Shared Decision Making with Patients

    February 17, 2018

    SAN DIEGO—At the ACR/ARHP 2017 Annual Meeting Nov. 3–8, a session on how to promote shared decision making with patients highlighted the role of the multidisciplinary professional team. And perhaps just as importantly, it noted the importance of providers recognizing their own implicit biases, which can get in the way of shared decision making. Presenters…

    Ethics Forum: Difficult Parents and Termination of Care in Pediatrics

    November 1, 2013

    A pediatric rheumatologist faces continuity of care issues for a patient with systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis whose parents are disruptive to the medical practice

    Is Shared Decision Making Possible in Rheumatology?

    August 1, 2014

    A rheumatologist voices skepticism that physicians, patients can arrive at mutually shared healthcare decisions

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences