Video: Every Case Tells a Story| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

High-Spending Doctors Are Less Likely to Be Sued

Andrew M. Seaman  |  November 5, 2015

NEW YORK (Reuters Health)—Providing more care than necessary may work to lower a doctor’s risk of being accused of malpractice, suggests a new U.S. study.

Although the results can’t prove extra expenditures are due to defensive medicine, the researchers found that doctors in Florida who provided the most costly care between 2000 and 2009 were also least likely to be sued between 2001 and 2010.

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

“By no means would I consider it to be conclusive, but it does signal to us that defensive medicine could work in lowering malpractice risk, but more research is needed to know if that’s true or not,” lead author Dr. Anupam Jena, of Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School in Boston, told Reuters Health.

He and his colleagues write in an article online Nov. 4 in BMJ that critics of the U.S. malpractice system suggest it encourages defensive medicine.

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

“If you ask physicians what’s the number one concern they have when you talk to them about their careers, I would say malpractice will come up as one of their top concerns,” Dr. Jena said.

Although it’s commonly accepted that doctors practice defensive medicine, the researchers write, no studies have been able to answer whether the practice actually reduces the risk of lawsuits.

For the new study, Dr. Jena’s team examined data from Florida hospitals, looking specifically at whether doctors within seven medical specialties were less likely to face lawsuits in the year following one when they racked up higher than average hospital charges.

Overall, they had data on nearly 25,000 doctors who oversaw about 18.3 million hospital admissions and faced over 4,300 malpractice claims.

“If you look at doctors who spend more in a given specialty, higher spending physicians get sued less often than low-spending physicians,” Dr. Jena said of the findings.

For example, an internist whose average hospitalization cost about $20,000 (the lowest spending group) faced a 1.2% probability of being sued the following year. That compared to a 0.3% probability of being sued if the internist’s average hospitalization cost about $39,000 (the highest spending group).

Researchers also found a lower probability of facing a lawsuit among obstetricians following a year when they performed a high number of cesarean sections.

Even when looking at individual obstetricians, the researchers found that one’s probability of facing lawsuits changed with the number of c-sections he or she performed. As a doctor performed more c-sections, his or her risk came down.

Page: 1 2 | Single Page
Share: 

Filed under:Legal UpdatesProfessional Topics Tagged with:costsdefensive medicinemalpractice

Related Articles

    What Gets a Good Rheumatologist Sued?

    November 1, 2007

    Pitfalls to avoid and habits that protect you from malpractice suits

    Malpractice Lawsuit Fear Provokes Defensive Medicine Response

    July 1, 2014

    Minimizing exposure to malpractice litigation has affected how physicians practice medicine

    Stronger Malpractice Laws May Not Prevent Surgical Complications

    January 15, 2017

    (Reuters Health)—More aggressive malpractice climates don’t necessarily protect patients from surgical complications, a new study suggests. Supporters of medical malpractice laws that make it easier for patients to sue doctors say these protections are necessary to improve care. But in the current study, the risk of litigation didn’t translate into better outcomes, said study leader…

    1% of U.S. Doctors Responsible for a Third of Malpractice Payments

    February 1, 2016

    (Reuters Health)—Just one out of every 100 U.S. doctors is responsible for 32% of the malpractice claims that result in payments to patients, according to a comprehensive study of 15 years’ worth of cases. And when a doctor has to pay out one claim, the chances are good that the same physician will soon be…

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences