Video: Every Case Tells a Story| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

How a Trip to the Vet Made Me a Better Doc

Bharat Kumar, MD, MME, FACP, FAAAAI, RhMSUS  |  Issue: March 2023  |  March 10, 2023

What she did was a mirror image of what I teach my trainees for the elbow exam. She first inspected the area for any skin changes, scratches or other signs of injury. Then she lightly palpated the joint, taking great care to observe Lexi’s reactions when pressing on her joint. She examined the other front leg, comparing one to the other, carefully trying to find any swelling or tenderness. And then, lastly, she gingerly placed her thumb and fingers on opposite sides of the elbow and assessed for range of motion.

All the while, she was talking out loud and explaining what she was seeing, feeling and thinking. It struck me that, at least among vertebrates, the principles of the physical examination are pretty much the same—functional testing in situations most closely resembling real-life conditions, close observation with every maneuver, comparison of active vs. passive range of motion and contrasting affected joints against unaffected ones.

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Keep Patients in the Driver’s Seat (with the Windows Down)

At that point, Dr. N turned to me and explained that an X-ray was probably necessary. Lexi was whisked to the back, and within a few minutes, that plain X-ray was placed on the screen. What’s notable here is that the time I was in the room without Lexi wasn’t seen as idle. As a veterinary tech had come to take Lexi away, I was handed a shiny brochure explaining canine arthritis. The brochure had the right balance between being comprehensive and comprehensible. Everything was laid out at probably a fifth grade reading level with lots of diagrams. It certainly kept me occupied as I waited for Lexi to return.

Thankfully, the radiographs were within normal limits. Perhaps a bit of soft tissue swelling was present but there were no structural defects. But what was surprising was that Dr. N didn’t downplay the normalness of the X-rays. She actually preempted the discussion by mentioning that radiographic changes of canine arthritis can be delayed and that the absence of significant findings doesn’t take away from Lexi’s apparent symptoms. That validation was a tiny thing, but an important step. I noticed that my palms were slightly sweaty; even though I didn’t feel very stressed, certainly I was in a fight-or-flight response. Having my unspoken concerns validated was comforting.

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

In the end, the encounter was mostly reassuring—perhaps a self-limited ligamental issue was at the root of Lexi’s distress. Dr. N offered a CT scan and a referral to a specialist—but not having pet insurance, I deferred. (I choked back the temptation to nervously utter a corny dad joke about CAT scans on dogs, but anyway.) All the while, I realized we were engaging in shared decision making. Dr. N was probing my interest in various options and was even-handed without framing things in a way that was coercive.

Page: 1 2 3 4 5 | Single Page
Share: 

Filed under:OpinionPatient PerspectivePractice SupportRheuminationsSpeak Out Rheum Tagged with:patient communication

Related Articles

    The Rheumatologist as Detective

    February 1, 2015

    A case of difficult-to-diagnose Whipple’s disease

    The Patient's Choice

    When Rheumatologists Are a Patient’s Second or Third Choice for Medical Opinion

    September 7, 2016

    Outside Exam Room No. 5, the chart rack was empty, so I assumed my new consult was late. Just in case, I looked back over my shoulder as I passed by the partially open door and glimpsed the lower half of a woman holding a three-ringed binder on her lap. I squinted and took a…

    The Role of Social Work in Patient-Centered Rheumatology Care

    December 1, 2013

    Social workers’ ability to build trusted relationships with patients helps enhance care coordination and can improve patient outcomes

    Rheumatologist Recalls Personal Experience with RA

    May 15, 2015

    In late March 2012, I awoke with pain in my left hand. I had difficulty moving my metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joints. They did not move smoothly, but clunked. As I repeatedly attempted to open and close my hand, I realized that I had morning stiffness. As the pain and stiffness gradually improved over the next hour,…

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences