Video: Every Case Tells a Story| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

How Medicare’s Chronic Care Management Payments Could Affect Primary Care

Will Boggs, MD  |  September 23, 2015

(Reuters Health)—Medicare’s new “chronic care management” (CCM) payment program could make it more financially feasible for physicians to deliver services between visits.

Under the new program, Medicare could reimburse primary care practices about $40 month for such things as medication management and communication with other doctors for patients who have two or more chronic medical conditions. Patients would have to agree to be enrolled and would have a 20% copay.

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

“Patients who have multiple complex medical problems like heart failure diabetes, chronic debilitating arthritis, Parkinson’s, and dementia frequently visit multiple providers in different organizations. They and their families frequently face multiple, sometimes conflicting decisions. CCM has the potential to organize the coordination under one provider, help make the patient’s care reflect their values and choices, streamline the process, and by paying physicians, make it more effective and efficient,” Dr. Fitzhugh C. Pannill from the University of Connecticut School of Medicine in Farmington, who wrote an editorial related to this report, told Reuters Health by email,

“Most importantly, CCM requires that each patient’s personal goals for their health care and medical decisions be routinely and systematically solicited, recorded, and communicated as part of the ‘Patient-Centered Care Plan,'” Pannill said.

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Dr. Sanjay Basu from Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California and his team looked at how the program would affect the typical primary practice.

Practices could see substantial increases in annual revenue (ranging from $69,665 to $77,295 in year one) if they used registered nurses (RNs) or licensed practical nurses (LPNs) to conduct the required annual wellness visit and used auxiliary staff to do some of the month-to-month management.

If the physician did the annual wellness visit and relied on staff to manage the monthly care, the annual revenue increases could be 15% to 40% lower.

And if the physician did both the annual visit and the month-to-month management, the net revenue to the practice could decrease because of the loss of income from replacing the face-to-face visits.

It would make more sense to hire a registered nurse (RN) or licensed practical nurse (LPN), but only if at least 131 Medicare patients per RN or 76 Medicare patients per LPN enrolled in the CCM program, the researchers reported in Annals of Internal Medicine.

How much this would cost the patient “would vary based on the Medicare plan of the patient. I think the biggest inducement is more personalized care every month and the hope that poorly controlled chronic conditions would be more well controlled with this strategy,” Basu told Reuters Health by email.

Page: 1 2 | Single Page
Share: 

Filed under:Practice Support Tagged with:Chronic Care ManagementMedicareprimary care

Related Articles

    Chronic Care Management Payments Can Increase Primary Care Revenues

    September 22, 2015

    NEW YORK (Reuters Health)—Medicare’s new chronic care management (CCM) payments could boost revenues for primary care practices, but many could experience net losses due to opportunity costs of face-to-face visit time, according to results from a modeling study. “The loss of revenue when MD’s did all the work themselves was somewhat surprising,” Dr. Sanjay Basu,…

    Rheumatologist Steven S. Overman Reflects on His Last Day of Practice, Future of Specialty

    November 16, 2015

    I am a few weeks post-retirement. Having written thank you notes and completed urgent home projects, I swing in a hammock at our currently fire-threatened cabin north of Winthrop, Wash., and reflect. I feel like a young boy while freely flipping pages of a hand-scribed picture book, The Principles of Uncertainty, by Maira Kalman. She…

    Proposed CMS Physician Fee Schedule May Offer Slight Increases

    August 4, 2016

    All eyes are on the new physician fee schedule proposed by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), which will be finalized this year and go into effect Jan. 1. The ACR is reviewing the proposal and will be providing comments and recommendations to CMS. And many rheumatologists have payment and coding questions: Will…

    Email Remains Dominant Communications Method in Medicine

    June 13, 2016

    Forty-five years ago, a computer engineer in Boston sent an electronic message between two computers some 10 feet apart. It took another 10 years or so before the electronic mail message was dubbed email—a term now, perhaps, more ubiquitous than any other in the lexicon of modern communications. Despite the seemingly definitive place email communication…

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences