Video: Every Case Tells a Story| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

Identity Theft: Red Flag Rules Take Effect

Staff  |  Issue: April 2009  |  April 1, 2009

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has adopted a rule that requires creditors to institute programs to spot suspicious activity (commonly called “red flags”) that may signal identity theft, and the red flag rules take effect May 1, 2009. The FTC defines a creditor as any entity that regularly accepts deferred payment for goods and services.

According to the American Medical Association (AMA), several FTC attorneys have interpreted the term “creditor” to include physicians, if the physicians do not collect full payment at the time of services rendered and instead bill the patient at a later date. This includes situations where a physician bills a patient’s health insurance first, noting that the patient is ultimately responsible for any amount due.

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

On February 4, the FTC responded to the AMA’s September 30 letter outlining why physician practices should not be considered “creditors” and asking that the FTC reconsider their interpretation of the term “creditors” in regard to physicians.

The FTC continues to assert that physicians who regularly bill their patients for services rendered are creditors and must develop and implement written identity theft–prevention programs for their practices by May 1, 2009.

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

The AMA will continue to stress that physicians are not creditors and will continue to ask the FTC to comply with the “Administrative Procedure Act” by issuing another rule, which would allow for a period of public comment. The AMA also plans to produce an awareness campaign around identity theft in the healthcare industry.

The Final Rule (16 CFR 681.2(b)(5)) mentions lenders such as banks, finance companies, automobile dealers, mortgage brokers, utility companies, and telecommunication companies, but does not include physicians or healthcare providers.

In order to comply with the rules set forth by the FTC, physicians and health professionals should ensure that their identity theft programs are able to:

  • Identify patterns and practices that could signal red flags;
  • Respond appropriately when red flag events occur; and
  • Periodically review the program to reflect any changes in risk.

The complete federal guideline can be found at www.ftc.gov. For more information on this or any other government affairs issue, contact Aiken Hackett, director of government affairs, at [email protected].

Share: 

Filed under:From the CollegePractice Support Tagged with:Advocating with YouAMAAmerican Medical Association (AMA)

Related Articles

    The ACR’s Representation in American Medical Association Critical as Review Looms

    March 17, 2017

    There is a saying that if the American Medical Association (AMA) did not exist, we would have to invent it. That is just what Dr. Nathan S. Davis did back in 1845 when he called for a national medical convention and laid the foundation for the establishment of the AMA in 1847. This new group would…

    Pointers for Rheumatologists Considering AMA Membership

    February 3, 2012

    Join the AMA. Don’t join because you agree with everything the AMA does. Join so we, as rheumatologists, will continue to have a voice and make a difference.

    Keep ACR’s Advocacy Voice Strong with the American Medical Association

    July 6, 2022

    As the result of years of coalition work with partners at the AMA, the ACR recently celebrated a major advocacy win when the FTC announced an investigation of PBM business practices. Join or renew your AMA membership before Sept. 1 so the ACR can keep delegate seats to drive action within the AMA.

    Practice Page: Protecting Your Practice through Compliance

    November 1, 2011

    Compliance programs are an effort by the government to maintain integrity in the healthcare system. These programs target activities causing improper payment to determine their root cause: Was it a mistake or error, was it inefficiency or waste of resources, is the provider bending the rules or abusing the system, or was it intentional deception or fraud? There are also laws dictating the compliance culture within practices and institutions; for example, red-flag rules, antikickback statute, and stark law, to name a few.

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences