Video: Every Case Tells a Story| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

Laboratory Testing for Diagnosis, Management of Patients with Rheumatic Disease

Peter H. Schur, MD  |  Issue: December 2014  |  December 1, 2014

Since the original description of anti-CCP antibodies,35,36 multiple studies have established the clinical utility of measuring these anticitrulline autoantibodies via commercial assays (anti-CCP) as a biomarker in RA.37 In addition to displaying a pooled sensitivity of 67% and specificity of 95% for the diagnosis of RA,38 it is now established that anti-CCP autoreactivity is prognostic for disease severity, radiographic erosions and the early recognition of RA.37,39 Rather than supplanting measurement of RF, the utility of anti-CCP has been demonstrated both by itself and in combination with measurement of serum RF. The consensus that has emerged from these studies is that, although anti-CCP and RF are frequently overlapping in their presence and prognostic significance, they are also independently informative in a significant subset of patients. The differences between subsets of RA patients with distinct autoantibody profiles remains poorly understood.

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE
Table 5: Autoantibodies in Patients with Systemic Sclerosis
click for large version
Table 5: Autoantibodies in Patients with Systemic Sclerosis

In addition to performance of these antibodies as a biomarker in the clinical setting, recent evidence suggests a pathogenic association between anticitrulline autoantibodies (measured by the anti-CCP test) and RA.40 Retrospective studies in multiple cohorts have demonstrated that measurable levels of anti-CCP autoantibodies frequently precede development of clinical arthritis with evidence for an increase in frequency and titers proximal to disease onset.41,42 At a population level, recent studies have shown that the presence of anti-CCP correlates with the presence of specific HLA-DR alleles with a particularly strong association with the “shared epitope” genes.43-46 At the level of basic mechanisms, citrullinated peptides from known autoantigens bind more avidly to MHC shared epitope than native peptides and are thereby capable of activating CD4+ T-lymphocytes. This property provides a plausible molecular basis for the genetic association seen in RA patients.47

An additional connection between smoking—a putative environmental trigger for RA—and anticitrulline autoantibodies provides further potential insight into mechanisms of disease evolution. It has long been appreciated that smoking confers an increased risk of RA.48-51 Although this finding has not been replicated in all cohorts, recent studies demonstrate that the increased risk conferred by tobacco exposure is present in the anti-CCP+ subset of subjects,37 and is associated with HLA‑DR alleles.45,46 Further, pulmonary lavage samples from smokers show citrullination of cellular proteins that is not present in nonsmoking subjects, providing a potential source of citrullinated antigens to induce autoantibody production. Moreover, citrulline posttranslational modification of tissue proteins occurs in diseased joints, and joint tissue citrullination levels are markedly elevated in the context of inflammation in both humans and experimental rodents.52-56

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 | Single Page
Share: 

Filed under:ConditionsPractice SupportQuality Assurance/ImprovementSjögren’s Disease Tagged with:ANA titerantinuclear antibodiesantinuclear antibody testDiagnosislab testlabspatient careRheumatic DiseaseRheumatoid arthritisrheumatologistSchurSclerodermaSjogren's

Related Articles

    Know Your Labs

    February 1, 2009

    A review of state-of-the-art testing for SLE and connective tissue disease.

    Know Your Labs, Part 2

    April 1, 2009

    A review of testing for rheumatoid arthritis

    The Role of ANA Positivity in Patients with RA

    September 28, 2021

    Recent research suggests patients with RA and a positive test for anti-nuclear antibody (ANA) may not have a different disease course than patients with RA who test negative for ANA. However, these patients may experience different treatment courses.

    Antiphospholipid Antibody Testing Update

    January 13, 2012

    Successes, challenges, and controversies of diagnostic methods for APS

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences