The Rheumatologist
COVID-19 News
  • Connect with us:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube
  • Feed
  • Home
  • Conditions
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • SLE (Lupus)
    • Crystal Arthritis
      • Gout Resource Center
    • Spondyloarthritis
    • Osteoarthritis
    • Soft Tissue Pain
    • Scleroderma
    • Vasculitis
    • Systemic Inflammatory Syndromes
    • Guidelines
  • Resource Centers
    • Ankylosing Spondylitis Resource Center
    • Gout Resource Center
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis Resource Center
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Resource Center
  • Drug Updates
    • Biologics & Biosimilars
    • DMARDs & Immunosuppressives
    • Topical Drugs
    • Analgesics
    • Safety
    • Pharma Co. News
  • Professional Topics
    • Ethics
    • Legal
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Career Development
      • Certification
      • Education & Training
    • Awards
    • Profiles
    • President’s Perspective
    • Rheuminations
  • Practice Management
    • Billing/Coding
    • Quality Assurance/Improvement
    • Workforce
    • Facility
    • Patient Perspective
    • Electronic Health Records
    • Apps
    • Information Technology
    • From the College
    • Multimedia
      • Audio
      • Video
  • Resources
    • Issue Archives
    • ACR Convergence
      • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Resource Center
      • Rheumatoid Arthritis Resource Center
      • Gout Resource Center
      • Abstracts
      • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence Home
    • American College of Rheumatology
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Research Reviews
    • ACR Journals
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
    • Rheumatology Image Library
    • Treatment Guidelines
    • Rheumatology Research Foundation
    • Events
  • About Us
    • Mission/Vision
    • Meet the Authors
    • Meet the Editors
    • Contribute to The Rheumatologist
    • Subscription
    • Contact
  • Advertise
  • Search
You are here: Home / Articles / Long-Term Benefits, Risks of Biologic Disease-Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs in Patients with RA

Long-Term Benefits, Risks of Biologic Disease-Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs in Patients with RA

December 19, 2017 • By Nan Yang, PharmD, & Kurt Oelke, MD, on behalf of the ARHP Practice Committee

  • Tweet
  • Email
Print-Friendly Version / Save PDF

The literature shows a positive correlation between severity of RA and the risk of both non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas (NHL) and Hodgkin’s lymphoma (HL), and it is believed that immunological elements can trigger transformation of normal lymphocyte polyclonal population into lymphoproliferative disease.25,26 Severe RA has a higher risk of lymphoma than the general population. In general, the risk ratio for lymphoma in RA patients is 2.0, and the hazard ratio for lymphoma in RA patients receiving bDMARDs falls into the range of 2.3–5.9, which is not significantly different from RA patients receiving sDMARDs per EULAR safety recommendations.1,27 Per these summarized data, there is no clear evidence that RA lymphoma risks are increased by bDMARDs.

You Might Also Like
  • Cardiovascular Disease Rate Differs Between SLE Patients of Different Races, Ethnicities
  • Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs Cut RA Risk
  • Long-Term Antibiotic Treatment for Lyme Disease Shows No Benefits
Explore This Issue
December 2017

Per new EULAR safety recommendations, the risk of melanoma may be slightly increased in patients receiving bDMARDs compared with sDMARDs with an adjusted HR of 1.5.1 However, a recent malignancy risk study conducted in Australian RA patients showed that melanoma risk was increased in both TNFi-treated and biologic-naive RA patients compared with the general population, with a standardized incidence ratio (SIR) of 2.72 and 2.03, respectively.28

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Conclusion

An evaluation of the long-term risks and benefits of using bDMARDs suggests that bDMARDs have more statistically significant clinical benefits in the areas of total joint replacement and CVD risk in RA patients. Malignancy should not be a barrier for RA patients to receive bDMARDs, as long as patients are under close monitoring by both rheumatologists and oncologists. Based on current studies, bDMARDs showed significant value clinically, but work still needs to be done to show significant long-term economic value. Future studies should be designed to demonstrate comprehensive and clear clinical roles of bDMARDs in heterogenous diseases, such as CVD.


Nan Yang, PharmD, is a one-year postgraduate employed by Evergreen Pharmacy in West Allis, Wis.

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Kurt Oelke, MD, is the clinical studies director at the Rheumatic Disease Center in Glendale, Wis.

References

  1. Ramiro S, Sepriano A, Chatzidionysiou K, et al. Safety of synthetic and biological DMARDs: A systematic literature review informing the 2016 update of the EULAR recommendations for management of rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017 Jun;76(6):935–938.
  2. Wolfe F, Zwillich SH. The long-term outcomes of rheumatoid arthritis: A 23-year prospective, longitudinal study of total joint replacement and its predictors in 1,600 patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 1998 Jun;41(6):1072–1082.
  3. Hekmat K, Jacobsson L, Nilsson JÅ, et al. Decrease in the incidence of total hip arthroplasties in patients with rheumatoid arthritis—results from a well defined population in south Sweden. Arthritis Res Ther. 2011 Apr 21;13(2):R67.
  4. David G, Tandon N, Waters HC, et al. Rheumatoid arthritis and joint replacement: Impact of biologics. Am J Pharm Benefits. 2014;6(6):256–264.
  5. Cordtz R, Hawley S, Prieto-Alhambra D, et al. Incidence of knee and hip replacements in rheumatoid arthritis patients following introduction of biological DMARDs: An interrupted time series analysis using nationwide health care registers [abstract 2017 OP0251]. EULAR 2017, Madrid.
  6. Hawley S, Cordtz R, Dreyer L, et al. The impact of biologic therapy introduction on hip and knee replacement among rheumatoid arthritis patients: An interrupted time series analysis using the clinical practice research datalink [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016;68(suppl 10)..
  7. Rheumatoid arthritis treatment costs. Rheumatoid Arthritis Support Network. Last updated 2016 Aug 3.
  8. Birnbaum H, Pike C, Kaufman R, et al. Societal costs of rheumatoid arthritis patients in the US. Cur Med Res Opin. 2010 Jan;26(1):77–90.
  9. Roubille C, Richer V, Starnino T, et al. The effects of tumour necrosis factor inhibitors, methotrexate, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and corticosteroids on cardiovascular events in rheumatoid arthritis, psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2015 Mar;74(3):480–489.
  10. Zanoli L, Granata A, Lentini P, et al. The effect of tumor necrosis factor antagonists on functional aortic stiffening. Clin Rheumatol. 2017 Aug;36(8):1927–1928.
  11. National Center for Chronic Disease and Prevention. Heart disease and stroke prevention: Addressing the nation’s leading killers [fact sheet].
  12. Antman EM, Bennett JS, Daugherty A, et al. Use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: An update for clinicians: A scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2007 Mar 27;115(12):1634–1642.
  13. Ng MK, Celermajer DS. Glucocorticoid treatment and cardiovascular disease. Heart. 2004;90(8):829–830.
  14. Agca R, Heslinga SC, Rollefstad S, et al. EULAR recommendations for cardiovascular disease risk management in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and other forms of inflammatory joint disorders: 2015/2016 update. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017 Jan;76(1):17–28.
  15. Mckellar GE, Mccarey DW, Sattar N, Mcinnes IB. Role for TNF in atherosclerosis? Lessons from autoimmune disease. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2009 Jun;6(6):410–417.
  16. Vassilopoulos D, Gravos A, Vlachopoulos C, et al. Adalimumab decreases aortic stiffness independently of its effect in disease activity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Rheumatol. 2015 Feb;34(2):359–364.
  17. Sverre H, Ingvild O, Tor-Arne H, et al. Increased levels of lipoprotein(a) in RA patients with cardiovascular disease [abstract 1474]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016;68(suppl 10).
  18. Barnabe C, Martin BJ, Ghali WA. Systematic review and meta-analysis: Anti-tumor necrosis factor α therapy and cardiovascular events in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2011 Apr;63(4):522–529.
  19. Desai RJ, Solomon DH, Schneeweiss S, et al. Tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitor use and the risk of incident hypertension in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Epidemiology. 2016 May;27(3):414–422.
  20. Myasoedova E, Gabriel SE, Mattson E, et al. Decreased cardiovascular mortality in patients with incident RA in recent years: Dawn of a new era in cardiovascular disease in RA? J Rheumatol. 2017 Jun;44(6):732–739.
  21. AbbVie Inc. Product information: HUMIRA subcutaneous injection, adalimumab subcutaneous injection.
  22. Solomon DH, Rassen JA, Kuriya B, et al. Heart failure risk among patients with rheumatoid arthritis starting a TNF antagonist. Ann Rheum Dis. 2013 Nov;72(11):1813–1818.
  23. Singh JA, Saag KG, Bridges SL, et al. 2015 American College of Rheumatology Guideline for the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016 Jan;68(1):1–26.
  24. Ljung L, Askling J, Rantapää-dahlqvist S, et al. The risk of acute coronary syndrome in rheumatoid arthritis in relation to tumour necrosis factor inhibitors and the risk in the general population: A national cohort study. Arthritis Res Ther. 2014 Jun 18;16(3):R127.
  25. Yadlapati S, Efthimiou P. Autoimmune/inflammatory arthritis associated lymphomas: Who is at risk? BioMed Res Int. 2016;2016:8631061. doi:10.1155/2016/8631061.
  26. Tvarůzková Z, Pavlová S, Doubek M, et al. [Lymphoproliferative disease in patients with autoimmune and inflammatory diseases: significance of antigenic stimulation and inflammatory processes]. Cas Lek Cesk. 2011;150(3):161–168.
  27. Wolfe F, Michaud K. Lymphoma in rheumatoid arthritis: the effect of methotrexate and anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy in 18,572 patients. Arthritis Rheum. 2004 Jun;50(6):1740–1751.
  28. Buchbinder R, Van doornum S, Staples M, et al. Malignancy risk in Australian rheumatoid arthritis patients treated with anti-tumour necrosis factor therapy: Analysis of the Australian Rheumatology Association Database (ARAD) prospective cohort study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2015 Oct 20;16:309.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 | Single Page

Filed Under: Conditions, Rheumatoid Arthritis Tagged With: ARHP, bDMARD, benefit, biologic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drug, Cardiovascular disease, Clinical, hip, knee, outcome, patient care, replacement, Research, Rheumatoid arthritis, rheumatologist, rheumatology, risk, study, therapyIssue: December 2017

You Might Also Like:
  • Cardiovascular Disease Rate Differs Between SLE Patients of Different Races, Ethnicities
  • Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs Cut RA Risk
  • Long-Term Antibiotic Treatment for Lyme Disease Shows No Benefits
  • Knee Replacement Offers Cardiovascular Benefits for Patients with Arthritis

Meeting Abstracts

Browse and search abstracts from the ACR Convergence and ACR/ARP Annual Meetings going back to 2012.

Visit the Abstracts site »

Rheumatology Research Foundation

The Foundation is the largest private funding source for rheumatology research and training in the U.S.

Learn more »

Simple Tasks

Learn more about the ACR’s public awareness campaign and how you can get involved. Help increase visibility of rheumatic diseases and decrease the number of people left untreated.

Visit the Simple Tasks site »

The Rheumatologist newsmagazine reports on issues and trends in the management and treatment of rheumatic diseases. The Rheumatologist reaches 11,500 rheumatologists, internists, orthopedic surgeons, nurse practitioners, physician assistants, nurses, and other healthcare professionals who practice, research, or teach in the field of rheumatology.

About Us / Contact Us / Advertise / Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

  • Connect with us:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube
  • Feed

Copyright © 2006–2021 American College of Rheumatology. All rights reserved.

ISSN 1931-3268 (print)
ISSN 1931-3209 (online)

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.
This site uses cookies: Find out more.