Video: Every Case Tells a Story| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

Make RA Outcomes Measures Work for You

Heather Lindsey  |  Issue: October 2007  |  October 1, 2007

Timothy Harrington, MD
Despite some of the challenges inherent in collecting data, “the impacts on our practice and patient care are greater than we imagined.” – Timothy Harrington, MD

Effect on Patient Interaction and Treatment

Overall, outcomes measures appear to improve patient treatment, as well as the efficiency of clinical practice, according to experts.

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Dr. Fraser says that assessing an individual’s DAS data helps him determine whether the patient is responding to a medication and if treatment should be altered.

“For [overall] trends, what I’ve seen using DAS is a general reduction in measurements when patients are taking biologics,” he says. Because data have indicated such an improvement, he adds biologics earlier to the treatment regimen.

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Outcomes measures also make the patient visit more efficient, says Dr. Bergman. Specifically, the RAPID assessment enables him to quickly determine whether or not a patient is experiencing pain or having trouble with joint function.

Dr. Harrington notes that, by standardizing the data set and having the patient self-generate information that becomes part of clinical record, his practice saves about 40% of previous traditional patient visit time. “This is time that can be spent discussing important problems and treatment or doing other work,” he says. Additionally, having a standard data template saves about 40% of dictation time.

Despite some of the challenges inherent in collecting data, “the impacts on our practice and patient care are greater than we imagined,” concludes Dr. Harrington.

Heather Lindsey is a medical journalist based in New York City.

Page: 1 2 3 | Single Page
Share: 

Filed under:ConditionsEMRsPractice SupportRheumatoid Arthritis Tagged with:Disease Activity Score (DAS)Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ)Medical decision makingMetricsPatientsRheumatoid Arthritis (RA)Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data (RAPID)

Related Articles

    Readers Answer ‘Twenty Questions’

    April 1, 2007

    The March Rheuminations column, “Twenty Questions, Part 1” inspired many letters from TR readers. Here are just a few of those responses.

    Twenty Questions, Part 1

    February 1, 2007

    What disease scores can teach you about rheumatology

    Go Digital

    April 1, 2007

    Rheumatologists’ recommendations for choosing an electronic medical record

    Embracing Techmanity

    May 1, 2008

    Will increasing technology in the exam room have a dehumanizing effect on the patient physician relationship? Maybe not.

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences