Video: Every Case Tells a Story| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

Many Doctors & Specialists Don’t Adhere to Fibromyalgia Diagnostic Criteria

Lorraine L. Janeczko  |  January 1, 2018

NEW YORK (Reuters Health)—Generalist doctors, and even many specialists, have relatively poor knowledge of the American College of Rheumatology 1990 and 2010 fibromyalgia diagnostic criteria, according to results of a survey conducted in Canada.

“Physicians do not have adequate and homogeneous knowledge of the fibromyalgia diagnostic criteria. Approximately half of physicians did not adhere to the criteria. Poor knowledge and adherence … may increase diagnosis delays and misdiagnoses. Knowledge translation strategies should be implemented to address this problem,” lead author Dr. Dinesh Kumbhare of the University of Toronto and his coauthors write in Pain Medicine, online Nov. 21.1

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

“I think most physicians are aware of fibromyalgia, although many still don’t believe in it and communicate this [lack of belief] to their patients. Even among physicians who accept the science and existence of fibromyalgia, there is lack of understanding of it, which hampers their ability to effectively communicate about it with their patients,” Dr. Eric L. Matteson, a professor of medicine at Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science in Rochester, Minnesota, tells Reuters Health by email.

“In general, the results are unsurprising and reflect the lack of knowledge about this common pain condition. Many patients who are referred to me with chronic pain problems are wrongly diagnosed with fibromyalgia or are wrongly diagnosed as not having fibromyalgia,” adds Dr. Matteson, who was not involved in the study.

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Dr. Kumbhare and his colleagues distributed a 37-item questionnaire to a convenience sample of 284 physicians who practice in urban clinical settings and diagnose chronic pain conditions: 100 family physicians, 69 anesthesiologists, 58 physical medicine and rehabilitation specialists, 29 rheumatologists and 28 neurologists.

The questionnaire tested the physicians’ knowledge of the 1990 fibromyalgia classification criteria and the 2010 diagnostic criteria. The researchers assessed the homogeneity of the responses and whether specialist training affected the physicians’ knowledge.

Overall, 12% of the respondents used only the 1990 criteria in their practice, 27% used the 2010 criteria, 12% used both, and 49% used no criteria. Therefore, only 51% of respondents adhered to these sets of criteria in diagnosing fibromyalgia.

Doctors with specialist training were more familiar with the criteria, but their knowledge was not comprehensive. Even physicians categorized as having the “most specialist training” had mean scores of only 55.4% for the 1990 criteria and 72.4% for the 2010 criteria.

The authors suggest that doctors and medical students learn about the criteria and updates to them—and apply the criteria in daily practice. They specifically recommend continuing medical education seminars, dropdown menus that provide fibromyalgia diagnostic criteria in electronic medical records, and online training modules on fibromyalgia diagnosis. They also say medical and residency pain curricula should offer advanced courses on chronic pain and fibromyalgia diagnosis.

Page: 1 2 | Single Page
Share: 

Filed under:ConditionsPain Syndromes Tagged with:American College of Rheumatology (ACR)criteriaDiagnostic CriteriaFibromyalgia

Related Articles

    Revising Fibromyalgia: One Year Later

    July 12, 2011

    The 2010 ACR fibromyalgia criteria capture the broader clinical picture and help ensure more appropriate diagnosis and management by primary care

    Is Fibromyalgia Overdiagnosed?

    October 10, 2016

    Are too many patients diagnosed with fibromyalgia? The co-authors of one new study believe that close to 75% of patients who have received a clinical fibromyalgia diagnosis do not meet the 2010 Preliminary American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Criteria for Fibromyalgia.1 They say these patients are false-positive and may be taking treatments they don’t need….

    Using Different Fibromyalgia Criteria Affects Prevalence Estimates

    September 14, 2021

    A recent paper illustrates how using different fibromyalgia criteria affects reports of its prevalence.1 Writing in Arthritis Care & Research, researchers found the Analgesic, Anesthetic, and Addiction Clinical Trial Translations, Innovations, Opportunities, and Networks–American Pain Society Pain Taxonomy (AAPT) criteria caused far more people to be categorized as having fibromyalgia than criteria put forth by…

    Treat-to-Target Strategy Evaluated for Fibromyalgia Care

    September 19, 2017

    Treat-to-target is a widely used approach for rheumatoid arthritis, in which rheumatologists prescribe treatments to reach established benchmarks of disease activity.1 Is it time for a similar approach for fibro­myalgia treatment, even though its pathogenesis, disease-activity measures and treatment algorithms are less well understood? Three fibromyalgia researchers present their case in a new paper, “Treat-to-Target…

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences