Video: Every Case Tells a Story| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

Maryland Gets an A; Most States Receive a C on ACR’s 1st Rheumatic Disease Report Card

Carina Stanton  |  Issue: October 2018  |  September 5, 2018

Empowering Patients to Act
With new knowledge gleaned from a state’s individual grade, the ultimate goal of the report card is to give all Americans the knowledge to speak out about the challenges people living with rheumatic diseases face, in terms of the direct medical care they are receiving and the broader impact to care caused by barriers on a national scale, such as care access and affordability, Dr. Weselman explains.

She notes two key factors underlying most states’ mediocre grades:

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE
  • Poor access: These grades were the result of high rates of residents without health insurance, a severe shortage of rheumatologists and weak laws limiting insurer practices, such as step therapy.
    Example: In Arizona, which received a C in the access category, there is only one practicing rheumatologist for every 139,000 people. Whereas, in Massachusetts, which received an A in the access category, there is one rheumatologist for every 19,000 people—a ratio nearly seven times higher.
  • Poor affordability: Twenty-six states received an F in the affordability category because they have not enacted legislation to require drug pricing transparency from pharmacy benefit managers nor to limit the use of specialty tiers that can result in patients paying thousands of dollars out of pocket each month.

Inviting Physicians to Speak Out
Certain states have found success with addressing issues of affordability on the legislative front in such areas as biosimilars, fail-first, prior authorization and specialty tiers. Example: In Arkansas, rheumatologists have had a strong voice in supporting laws that regulate insurers’ step therapy requirements.

Along with the report card grades, Dr. Weselman hopes an understanding of the legislative efforts and wins happening across the country at the state and federal levels can inspire rheumatologists to pursue and support similar legislation that can make a difference in promoting a better quality of life for rheumatology patients.

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Does Your State Make the Grade?
Share your state’s report card  on access to care, and encourage patients and families to share their stories and take action as part of RDAM this September. You can also encourage patients to take the ACR’s new online Pledge to Live Well. Pledge takers will receive a pedometer and wristband to encourage them to stay active.


Carina Stanton is a freelance science journalist in Denver.

Page: 1 2 | Single Page
Share: 

Filed under:American College of RheumatologyLegislation & AdvocacyPatient PerspectivePractice Support

Related Articles
    2022 RDAM Report Card

    Rheumatic Disease Report Card 2022 Released: No A’s Given Overall; Oklahoma Ranks Most Improved

    September 13, 2022

    The 2022 Rheumatic Disease Report Card found that many states can improve access to care, affordability & activity for their residents living with rheumatic diseases.

    Credit Card Program Helps Physician Practice Manage Its Income

    March 20, 2017

    As Erin L. Arnold, MD, partner, Orthopaedics and Rheumatology of the North Shore, in Skokie, Ill, observed patients’ health insurance deductibles and copays getting dramatically higher and higher, she decided that it was time to explore a program that would require patients to keep a credit card on file. “As a private practice and small…

    Kelly Weselman, MD, FACR: Spreading Good in Words & Deeds

    January 18, 2018

    Communication is invaluable when it comes to spreading the word about many different aspects of care for rheumatic diseases, whether it’s evidence-based patient education support for rheumatologists, information on access to medication options for patients or helping educate the public about the practice of rheumatology. That’s according to Kelly Weselman, MD, FACR, a rheumatologist with…

    Rheumatologist Finds ACR Volunteer Work Enriching Professionally and Personally

    May 1, 2013

    Kelly Weselman, MD, has advanced her clinical practice, improved her marketing skills, and advocated for rheumatology while working on ACR committees

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences