Video: Every Case Tells a Story| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

Measuring Up for Meaningful Use

Staff  |  Issue: April 2011  |  April 13, 2011

Measuring Up for Meaningful Use

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services’ (CMS’) Electronic Health Record (EHR) Incentive Program—Meaningful Use—requires that eligible providers participating in the incentive program successfully demonstrate meaningful use of the EHR system by reporting on a set of core and menu functional objectives to qualify for incentive payments of up to $44,000.

If you want to earn the incentive payment, it is imperative to review and fully understand the objectives as well as how and in what form the objectives are measured. Simply reviewing a list of Meaningful Use objectives and then working from there will not lead to success. The devil is in the details of what really needs to be done to meet those objectives. Work with your EHR vendor to verify that the appropriate processes for data entry are in place so that your EHR system can measure and report in a way that truly meets the measure and proves to CMS that you are a meaningful user of the EHR.

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Understanding the Measures

Each of the Stage 1 objectives for Meaningful Use has an associated measure to gauge compliance and guide reporting (see Figure 1, right, and Figure 2 p. 20). These measures include specific terminology that clarifies how the objectives will be measured and the threshold that you must meet to be considered successful and qualify for incentive payments.

Figure 1: Menu functionality measures
click for large version
Figure 1: Menu functionality measures

Among these is the concept of a “unique” patient. Many measures are based on counting data entered into the EHR or actions taken based on unique patients. A unique patient is one that is seen by the eligible provider more than once during the EHR reporting period. When a measure is based on unique patients, for the purposes of measurement calculation, that patient is only counted once in the denominator population for the measure regardless of the number of visits that patient had during the reporting period. For example, when the calculation in your first payment year (reporting year refers to the first year the eligible professional [EP] submits for payment, regardless of the calendar year, and is a 90-day period) is performed for the computerized physician order entry objective, the EHR system will review all the patients whom you have seen at least twice during that 90-day period and will count each patient, not each visit, once.

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Each measure will be assessed and reported based on a percentage or a yes/no attestation. Many of the core objectives require measures reported according to a specified numerator, denominator, and exclusions (if relevant). The denominator identifies all the eligible cases for a measure, and the numerator describes an outcome or action relevant to that denominator population—most often the number of activities or functions performed using an EHR (see Figure 3, below right).

Page: 1 2 3 4 | Single Page
Share: 

Filed under:EMRsFrom the CollegePractice SupportTechnology Tagged with:Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS)electronic health recordHealth Information TechnologyLegislationMeaningful use

Related Articles

    The New Year Brings New Opportunities in HIT

    February 12, 2011

    January kicked off a new era for health information technology (HIT). A new year brings new opportunities, with the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) electronic health record (EHR) incentive program topping the list. But what is meaningful EHR use, and what does it mean for you? What are the steps to get started?

    Planning is Key to Meaningful Use

    December 12, 2011

    Practices face many challenges when adopting EHRs

    Stage 2 of the EHR Incentive Program

    October 7, 2011

    Although reporting for Stage 1 of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Electronic Health Record (EHR) Incentive Program began just this year, the rules, objectives, and measures for Stage 2 are already being established. Last June, the Office of the National Coordinator (ONC) for Health Information Technology (IT) presented CMS with its recommendations for Stage 2 of the CMS EHR Incentive Program which builds on the Stage 1 objectives supporting EHR utilization for data capture and sharing.

    Meaningful Use and Patient Engagement – Supporting eHealth Literacy

    September 1, 2011

    It is no surprise that understanding health information and navigating the U.S. health system can overwhelm even the savviest patients with advanced literacy skills. Data from the National Adult Literacy Survey suggest that nearly 50% of all adults have problems understanding many aspects of healthcare, including prescriptions, appointment slips, and health education materials.

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences