Video: Every Case Tells a Story| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

Measuring Up for Meaningful Use

Staff  |  Issue: April 2011  |  April 13, 2011

For the Meaningful Use Objectives, the denominator is based on one of the following:

Simply reviewing a list of meaningful-use objectives and then working from there will not lead to success.

  • Counting actions for patients whose records are maintained using certified EHR technology.
    • Example measure: More than 40% of all permissible prescriptions written by the EP are transmitted electronically using certified EHR technology.
    • What this means: The denominator includes all patients whose records are maintained in the certified EHR system. Other patients seen by the eligible provider but not recorded in the EHR (e.g., those with paper records) are not included in the denominator. For this measure, the denominator would include all of the permissible prescriptions, excluding controlled substances, for patients whose records are in the EHR system. The numerator would then identify how many of those prescriptions were generated and sent via electronic prescribing.
  • All unique patients seen during the reporting period, regardless of whether the patient’s records are maintained using certified EHR technology.
    • Example measure: More than 50% of all unique patients seen by the EP have demographics recorded as structured data.
    • What this means: The denominator includes all unique patients seen during the reporting period, including those with both paper and electronic documentation. The eligible provider will need to generate a report of patient records stored in the EHR and also manually count any paper records for unique patients seen during the reporting period. The numerator would then assess how many of those patients have demographics entered into the EHR system as structured data.
  • Count of actions for qualifying unique patients whose records are maintained in the certified EHR technology.
    • Example measure: More than 30% of all unique patients with at least one medication in their medication list seen by the EP have at least one medication order entered using the computerized physician order entry (CPOE).
    • What this means: This denominator refines “counting action” denominators, including only unique patients who meet additional criteria (e.g., a specified event). In this measure, the denominator includes all patients seen more than once by the EP and who have at least one medication in their medication list. The numerator would then assess how many of those patients had at least one medication entered via CPOE.
Figure 2: Core functionality measures
click for large version
Figure 2: Core functionality measures

For those objectives that aren’t quantified using a percentage and performance threshold, the rule calls for reporting via yes/no attestation.

EPs Practicing in Multiple Locations

For those EPs practicing in multiple locations with certified EHR technology available for 50% or more of their total patient encounters during the reporting period, EHR reporting for Meaningful Use will only include those encounters where certified EHR systems are available at the start of the reporting period.

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE
ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Page: 1 2 3 4 | Single Page
Share: 

Filed under:EMRsFrom the CollegePractice SupportTechnology Tagged with:Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS)electronic health recordHealth Information TechnologyLegislationMeaningful use

Related Articles

    The New Year Brings New Opportunities in HIT

    February 12, 2011

    January kicked off a new era for health information technology (HIT). A new year brings new opportunities, with the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) electronic health record (EHR) incentive program topping the list. But what is meaningful EHR use, and what does it mean for you? What are the steps to get started?

    Planning is Key to Meaningful Use

    December 12, 2011

    Practices face many challenges when adopting EHRs

    Stage 2 of the EHR Incentive Program

    October 7, 2011

    Although reporting for Stage 1 of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Electronic Health Record (EHR) Incentive Program began just this year, the rules, objectives, and measures for Stage 2 are already being established. Last June, the Office of the National Coordinator (ONC) for Health Information Technology (IT) presented CMS with its recommendations for Stage 2 of the CMS EHR Incentive Program which builds on the Stage 1 objectives supporting EHR utilization for data capture and sharing.

    Meaningful Use and Patient Engagement – Supporting eHealth Literacy

    September 1, 2011

    It is no surprise that understanding health information and navigating the U.S. health system can overwhelm even the savviest patients with advanced literacy skills. Data from the National Adult Literacy Survey suggest that nearly 50% of all adults have problems understanding many aspects of healthcare, including prescriptions, appointment slips, and health education materials.

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences