Video: Every Case Tells a Story| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

Medicare’s Most Favored Nation Is My Least Favorite Notion!

Angus B. Worthing, MD  |  December 8, 2020

In case you missed it, on Nov. 20, the  Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), a department within the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, announced that it will overhaul the payment system for Medicare Part B (i.e., infusion) drugs on Jan. 1, 2021. The plan is called the Most Favored Nation (MFN) Model.1 What is it, and why is it a potential blow to the rheumatology community? And what can you do, in a few minutes, to help stop it?

Long story short: The model will cut reimbursement for 50 expensive drugs, change billing practices and cause 9% of patients to lose access to their medicines—all with just a few weeks’ notice. As always, the ACR has made it easy for you to raise your voice and advocate for change. Read on.

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Pertinent Details
Starting Jan. 1, the reimbursement to providers of 50 of the most expensive drugs administered in clinics will be reduced, according to a blend of the best international price and the current U.S. price. In 2021, the payment amount will start as a blend of 25% of the international price and 75% of the U.S. price; in 2022, the blend will be 50–50 international price and U.S. price; in 2023, it will comprise 75% of the international price and 25% of the U.S. price, and finally, in 2024–27, the reimbursement will be 100% of the international price. The CMS estimates that reimbursement will fall 7% on Jan. 1, and again yearly over the next three years. Ten rheumatology drugs made the list: rituximab, denosumab, non-biosimilar infliximab, abatacept, certolizumab, golimumab IV, tocilizumab, ustekinumab, Orthovisc and pegloticase.

The add-on payment for drugs will also change. Currently, during the public health emergency, providers are paid 6% of the average sales price (i.e., ASP+6; previously, this amount was reduced by sequestration cuts to ASP+4.3%). To “remove or reduce the financial incentive to prescribe higher cost drugs more frequently”—the CMS does not acknowledge all of our drugs are similarly expensive, rendering any incentive moot—providers will be paid a fixed amount for each drug dose: $148.73. This was calculated by averaging the 2019 price of the 50 listed drugs plus 6% and adjusting for inflation in 2020. The add-on price will apparently rise annually for inflation. By my back-of-the-envelope calculation, for a 70 kg patient, the add-on payment for an infusion of Remicade (5 mg/kg) will increase by about $50, the add-on for tocilizumab (8 mg/kg) will reduce by about $30, and the add-on for rituximab (1,000 mg) will drop about $100. (Note: Biosimilar infliximab is not on the list.)

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

9% of patients will lose access to their medications. … Is there a worse time in modern history to put 10,000 elderly rheumatology patients on steroids or admit them to hospitals?

Meanwhile, the MFN will cause new administrative burdens. Billers will spend more time editing Medicare claims: They will need to identify Medicare Part B beneficiaries who receive MFN drugs (the list changes over time), and comply with new billing instructions to add a separate line item and a correct charge amount. Practices may be asked by manufacturers to provide price information on drug inventory provided through the MFN model (as distinct from other drug inventory). Finally, practices will need to purchase drugs parsimoniously, especially this month, anticipating that a drug bought on Dec. 31 will be reimbursed 7% less if it is administered to a patient on Jan. 1.

Page: 1 2 3 4 | Single Page
Share: 

Filed under:Legislation & AdvocacyOpinionProfessional TopicsSpeak Out Rheum Tagged with:MedicareMost Favored Nation

Related Articles

    ACR Commends CMS Decision to Withdraw Most Favored Nation Payment Model for Part B Drugs

    August 11, 2021

    ATLANTA—The American College of Rheumatology (ACR) today applauded the U.S. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ (CMS) decision to withdraw a proposed rule to implement the “Most Favored Nation” (MFN) payment model for Part B drugs. Leaders felt the policy would have dramatically disrupted patient access to critical therapies needed to manage rheumatic diseases and…

    Prepare Now to Survive MACRA

    July 5, 2016

    The year 2015 brought an end to the much-maligned Sustainable Growth Rate (SGR), sometimes known as the “doc fix.” The SGR established limits on Medicare reimbursement for physicians, and each year, physicians and those lobbying on their behalf were forced to stave off drastic cuts to their payments. “The SGR was Congress’s attempt to control…

    Medicare Bills Under the Magnifying Glass

    December 1, 2009

    What you need to know about the Recovery Audit Contractor program

    ACR Leads Fight Against Proposed Reimbursement Cuts to E/M Services

    August 7, 2018

    On July 12, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) issued its proposed plan for changes to the Medicare Physician Fee Schedule for 2019.1 Citing the need to reduce paperwork and improve patient care, the CMS detailed a number of changes to payments physicians receive from Medicare that could have a significant impact on…

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences