Video: Every Case Tells a Story| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

Medicare’s Most Favored Nation Is My Least Favorite Notion!

Angus B. Worthing, MD  |  December 8, 2020

With large price points and small margins, any fluctuation could cause severe financial ramifications—especially for small practices. Meanwhile, of course, patients’ access to treatments will be at risk.

Take Action
What is being done to stop the MFN? All three branches of government are starting to hear from stakeholders. Industry has engaged the judiciary by predictably filing lawsuits to stop the model from going into effect. They rightly claim the scope is too large for a pilot demonstration project (the CMS claims authority to implement the MFN as an experimental pilot project), because covering the entire country leaves no control group for comparison. They also allege the plan is an illegal regulation, because it skipped the usual process of publishing a draft for comment and went straight to an Interim Final Rule.3 In the decade I’ve been doing advocacy work, I hadn’t yet heard of an Interim Final Rule.

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

The ACR makes it easy to raise your voice to the executive branch. The ACR website has pre-written comment language in its Legislative Action Center. It only takes a few minutes to add in your own details and concerns and send an email to the CMS with a few clicks. Comments are due by Jan. 26, 2021.

A little advice about sending comments to the CMS: Be polite, describe the consequences of the regulation from patients’ perspectives (e.g., if practices go underwater, the patients they serve lose access), and please note that comments are published publicly. (Note: Your address and email will not be made public when you submit comments through the ACR website.)

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Lastly, if neither the courts nor President Trump’s CMS stop this plan, we’ll need Congress to step in. Tell your representative and senator to block the MFN from going into effect by emailing them through the ACR’s Legislative Action Center or by publicly tagging on Twitter. Tell them your concerns about the rapid timeline for implementation, administrative burdens that take you and your team away from patients and pandemic preparation, and, most importantly, the harmful consequences of the MFN on their constituents, whom you serve.


Angus Worthing, MD, FACP, FACR, is a practicing rheumatologist with Arthritis & Rheumatism Associates PC, Washington, D.C., and a clinical assistant professor of medicine at Georgetown University.

References
1. Most favored nation (MFN) model. A rule by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. 42 CFR 513. Federal Register. 2020 Nov 27;85 FR 76180:76180–76259.
2. McCormick N, Wallace ZS, Sacks CA, et al. Decomposition analysis of spending and price trends for biologic antirheumatic drugs in Medicare and Medicaid. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2020 Feb;72(2):234–241.
3. Morse S. American Hospital Association and PhRMA question legality of Most Favored National Model. Healthcare Finance. 2020 Nov 23.

Page: 1 2 3 4 | Single Page
Share: 

Filed under:Legislation & AdvocacyOpinionProfessional TopicsSpeak Out Rheum Tagged with:MedicareMost Favored Nation

Related Articles

    ACR Commends CMS Decision to Withdraw Most Favored Nation Payment Model for Part B Drugs

    August 11, 2021

    ATLANTA—The American College of Rheumatology (ACR) today applauded the U.S. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ (CMS) decision to withdraw a proposed rule to implement the “Most Favored Nation” (MFN) payment model for Part B drugs. Leaders felt the policy would have dramatically disrupted patient access to critical therapies needed to manage rheumatic diseases and…

    Prepare Now to Survive MACRA

    July 5, 2016

    The year 2015 brought an end to the much-maligned Sustainable Growth Rate (SGR), sometimes known as the “doc fix.” The SGR established limits on Medicare reimbursement for physicians, and each year, physicians and those lobbying on their behalf were forced to stave off drastic cuts to their payments. “The SGR was Congress’s attempt to control…

    Medicare Bills Under the Magnifying Glass

    December 1, 2009

    What you need to know about the Recovery Audit Contractor program

    ACR Leads Fight Against Proposed Reimbursement Cuts to E/M Services

    August 7, 2018

    On July 12, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) issued its proposed plan for changes to the Medicare Physician Fee Schedule for 2019.1 Citing the need to reduce paperwork and improve patient care, the CMS detailed a number of changes to payments physicians receive from Medicare that could have a significant impact on…

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences