Video: Every Case Tells a Story| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

New Study Probes Hydroxychloroquine Adherence During Pregnancy

Antonia Chan & Julia F. Simard, ScD  |  Issue: May 2023  |  May 11, 2023

For primary adherence, we found that patients were very likely to fill their new prescriptions for HCQ, often within 30 days of the order. Overall fill rates were 89% in the pre-pregnancy period and 93% during the pregnancy period. Consistent with other studies, we reported that 53–68% of pregnancies in women with lupus during the study period had HCQ available for filling (new orders and refills available), meaning that over 30% of pregnant women with lupus had no order on file to be filled.

Using prescription fill data without accounting for whether patients could fill a prescription in the first place may misrepresent the reason for low rates of HCQ use in pregnant women with lupus. The number of HCQ orders covering the pregnancy period determines the denominator of how many patients could have potentially used the medication.

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

At the same time, it is difficult to assume what the absence of an order means. Whether a provider did not recommend HCQ or a patient declined it during the visit cannot be inferred through claims or prescription data. Understanding physician adherence to guidelines requires qualitative data on the conversations that took place during these patients’ visits.

Shared Decision Making

To explore reasons for non-use of HCQ by women with lupus during pregnancy, we turned to physicians’ treatment notes. In prior interviews, patients with SLE reported concerns about toxicity and preferences to decrease or stop treatment, while still respecting physician judgment.9 Less is known about how pregnancy affects physician and patient attitudes toward HCQ use.

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Qualitative studies of overall medication non-adherence among patients with lupus have suggested that hurried/poor communication with rheumatologists and patient perceptions of minimal benefit from treatment with HCQ may contribute to non-adherence.10-12 One qualitative study from 2018 found that rheumatologists cited patients’ preconceived notions/lack of trust in their recommendations, as well as gaps in other clinicians’ prescribing knowledge, as the primary barrier to medication adherence among women with lupus during pregnancy.13

Using a cohort of deliveries by women with lupus at Stanford Hospital, California, from 2008–16, we identified a case series of 38 pregnant women with lupus not taking HCQ at the first prenatal visit. We included prescription orders and physician notes related to SLE starting one year before the first documented prenatal visit through to the delivery date.

Provider specialty, prior history of lupus medication use, changes to lupus management during pregnancy and reasons for deferring HCQ were abstracted from notes through chart review. Reasons for deferral were separated into explicit and implicit themes, depending on whether physicians’ notes directly addressed HCQ use.

Page: 1 2 3 4 5 | Single Page
Share: 

Filed under:ConditionsResearch RheumSystemic Lupus Erythematosus Tagged with:adherenceHydroxychloroquine (HCQ)pregnancy

Related Articles

    A Better Family Plan

    October 1, 2007

    How to minimize the risks of pregnancy for women with SLE

    Reading Rheum

    November 1, 2007

    Handpicked Reviews of Contemporary Literature

    Should Hydroxychloroquine Level Testing Be Standard Care in Lupus?

    February 13, 2020

    The Johns Hopkins Lupus Center, Baltimore, has described its experience using hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) levels.1 Forty-four percent of its patients had levels below 500 ng/mL (partial nonadherence); 13% were severely nonadherent (<200 ng/mL). They were shown their results and educated on HCQ adherence. Adherence then improved to 80%; those with lower HCQ levels had higher disease…

    Rheumatologists Should Discuss with Patients Use of Immunomodulatory Agents During Pregnancy

    November 16, 2016

    The decision to continue or discontinue immunomodulatory medications during pregnancy is a difficult one for both patients and physicians. On the one hand, when left untreated, rheumatic conditions can cause harm to an unborn child, as well as to the pregnant mother. On the other hand, medications can be harmful to a developing fetus. In…

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences