Video: Every Case Tells a Story| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

Opinion: Why Rheumatologists Should Adhere to Standard of Care

Bruce Rothschild, MD  |  Issue: February 2016  |  February 16, 2016

Because we are role models, we promulgate a certain level of care, as exemplified by the completeness of our patient evaluations. If we, as rheumatologists, don’t hold the line, what kind of example are we setting for those healthcare providers not so versed in the disorders for whose treatment we are so dedicated?

Consequences of Deviation

Are there rheumatologists who don’t adhere to minimal standard of care recommendations? Unfortunately, there appear to be, and I believe that to be unacceptable. Patients have suffered irreversible, preventable outcomes when DMARD monitoring has been limited to six-month intervals. Those patients who declined timely appointments (some to save the cost of several physician visits a year) certainly don’t find the toxic results cost effective. When they or their survivors take legal action, the rheumatologist has no defense—because the practice did not meet usual and customary standards.1 If primary care physicians follow that example, does the rheumatologist have shared liability?

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

If rheumatologists do not stand up to patient demands that compromise safety, what kind of example do we set for primary care physicians with typically quite busy practices? It takes time to change patient perspectives when the patient is fixed in their demand. It takes integrity to deny unreasonable patient demands or to discharge such patients from a practice.

In the words of Benjamin Franklin, “We must all hang together, or assuredly we shall all hang separately.” If some rheumatologists deviate from the standard of care, interacting primary care physicians will get the perception that such behavior is so acceptable that they will fail to recognize the quality of care provided by rheumatologists who adhere to the standard of care.

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

The frequency of complications (related to failure to adhere to such standards) may lessen primary care physicians’ appreciation of what rheumatologists have to offer and reduce appropriate referrals, to the detriment of all concerned—rheumatologists, primary care physicians and the patients we all serve.


Bruce Rothschild, MDBruce Rothschild, MD, is professor of medicine at Northeast Ohio Medical University and provides rheumatology services at the Indiana Regional Medical Center. He is a Fellow of the American College of Physicians, the ACR and the Society of Skeletal Radiology and was elected to the International Skeletal Society.

Reference

  1. Personal communications.

Page: 1 2 | Single Page
Share: 

Filed under:Practice SupportQuality Assurance/Improvement Tagged with:patient carePractice ManagementQualityRheumatic Diseaserheumatologiststandard

Related Articles

    Opinion: Adhering to Standards of Care Helps Manage Risk

    May 13, 2016

    Medicare and other third-party payers have started predicating reimbursement on adherence to standards of care. Post hoc chart reviews have resulted in substantial take-backs for failure to adhere to those values in cardiology, pulmonology and expanding to other areas. Outpatient medicine is also being subjected to such scrutiny. The question of standards and who sets…

    Therapeutic Drug Monitoring May Offer Little Benefit to Patient Remission Rates During Infliximab Induction Therapy

    August 9, 2021

    Although rheumatologists prescribe tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi’s) to treat several rheumatic diseases, they recognize immunogenicity influences the efficacy and safety of TNFi’s. Example: The formation of anti-drug antibodies can affect infusion reactions and cause low-serum drug levels and therapeutic failure. The induction phase is a period of high incidence of immunogenicity, and observational data…

    How Rheumatologists Can Improve Patients’ Satisfaction, Patient Care, and Survey Scores

    October 10, 2016

    Many reasons exist to strive for high patient satisfaction, including those related to maintaining certification requirements, risk management, reimbursement and simply having a competitive practice, but the most important one is that by achieving high patient satisfaction, you will find that your patients will be more motivated and more engaged in their individual care, says…

    The Patient's Choice

    When Rheumatologists Are a Patient’s Second or Third Choice for Medical Opinion

    September 7, 2016

    Outside Exam Room No. 5, the chart rack was empty, so I assumed my new consult was late. Just in case, I looked back over my shoulder as I passed by the partially open door and glimpsed the lower half of a woman holding a three-ringed binder on her lap. I squinted and took a…

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences