Video: Every Case Tells a Story| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

Patients Get Mixed Reactions from Docs over Mail-Ordered Genetic Tests

Andrew M. Seaman  |  March 3, 2016

(Reuters Health)—Patients who order direct-to-consumer genetic tests report mixed experiences when they take the results to their doctors, a new study found.

About a quarter of people who ordered direct-to-consumer genetic testing from such companies as 23andMe reported discussing the results with their primary care doctors. But nearly one in five were not at all satisfied with the conversations, researchers report.

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

How doctors react to patients’ direct-to-consumer genetic test results matters, said senior author Dr. Robert Green, director of the Genomes2People Research Program at Brigham and Women’s Hospital in Boston.

“Even if doctors want to make intellectual points, which is their prerogative, I think they can do it in ways that a) respects their patient and b) finds a teachable moment around health issues that dovetails with the patient’s interests,” he told Reuters Health.

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Direct-to-consumer genetic testing allows people to order tests from the comfort of their own homes without a doctor’s permission. The results can provide information about ancestry; non-medical traits, such as tongue curling; and health risks, such as diabetes—as well as how a person might respond to certain drugs, write the researchers in the Annals of Internal Medicine.

In 2013, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration halted health analyses from the popular direct-to-consumer genetic testing company 23andMe. But those kinds of tests are available in other countries and will likely be available in the U.S. again, Green said.

In the meantime, companies in the U.S. can still run the tests and provide consumers with raw genetic data. But it’s difficult for patients to obtain an analysis of that data.

To see how patients felt about discussing their results with their doctors, the researchers surveyed new 23andMe and Pathway Genomics customers between March and July 2012. Overall, they had data from 1,026 customers.

Of those, 63% said they planned to share their results with their primary care doctors—and six months later, 27% had done so. Another 8% reported sharing the results with other healthcare providers.

The majority of customers didn’t ultimately share their findings and said the results either weren’t important enough or they didn’t have time.

Thirty-five percent of those who shared the results with their primary doctors were very satisfied with the encounter, but 18% said they were not at all satisfied.

Those who had satisfying experiences frequently reported that their doctors understood genetics, willingly discussed the results and didn’t differ in the interpretation of the results.

Page: 1 2 | Single Page
Share: 

Filed under:Practice SupportProfessional Topics Tagged with:genetic riskgenetic testpatient carePrimary Care Physicians

Related Articles

    Experts Discuss the Latest Precision Medicine Research

    February 18, 2018

    SAN DIEGO—In just two decades, precision medicine has gone from futuristic concept to realistic toolbox for clinical physicians. At the 2017 ACR Clinical Research Conference on Nov. 3, the Precision Medicine in Rheumatic Diseases: Hopes and Challenges lecture featured rheumatologists and experts on genetics, genomics, pharmaco­genetics and big data who spoke about the latest research…

    Corona Borealis Studio / shutterstock.com

    The Reliability & Utility of Serological Antibody Tests in COVID-19

    September 11, 2020

    Serological testing for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) antibodies may play a critical role in the management of the worldwide health crisis. Such testing may reveal key information for epidemiology, convalescent plasma therapies and vaccine development. However, the situation is complex, and much is unknown. Although such testing may ultimately be used to…

    Serological Antibody Tests in COVID-19: Test Reliability and Utility

    June 10, 2020

    Serological testing for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) antibodies may play a critical role in the management of the worldwide health crisis. Such testing may reveal key information for epidemiology, convalescent plasma therapies and vaccine development. However, the situation is complex, and much is unknown. Although such testing may ultimately be used to…

    Consumers Add Perspective to Arthritis Research

    November 1, 2006

    It has been my distinct pleasure to work with consumer collaborators—people living with arthritis—on research projects, advisory boards, and review panels, in consensus meetings to establish research agendas, and as co-educators in health professional programs. Those I work with have chosen the term “consumer collaborator” to reflect their contribution to and eventual use of our partnerships, although others might call them patients or clients.

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences