Video: Every Case Tells a Story| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

Patients OK with Secure Web Portals for Test Results

Lisa Rapaport  |  November 15, 2015

(Reuters Health)—Of all the ways for patients to receive their medical test results, one option—password-protected websites—appears to be preferred much of the time, a study suggests.

U.S. researchers surveyed about 400 adults and found they were generally comfortable with web portals regardless of how sensitive the test results might be.

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

This was among the most popular options for getting results from routine cholesterol screenings, and the most preferred method for outcomes from tests for sexually transmitted infections (STIs) and genetic abnormalities.

Even though doctors often call or email patients with test results, the study findings suggest that this isn’t necessarily what patients want, said senior author Dr. Daniel Merenstein of Georgetown University Medical Center in Washington, D.C.

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

“This study makes clear that the majority of people prefer something different than what we’ve been doing,” Merenstein said.

“With highly sensitive results such as genetic tests results or tests for STIs, patients may not trust a text message or an email or voicemail to remain private if somebody else happens to see their phone,” Merenstein added. “Password-protected websites offer them some additional security and also the convenience to retrieve the results whenever they want.”

To understand patient preferences for getting test results, Merenstein and colleagues created a survey they distributed in paper form around the Georgetown campus and online, via Facebook and email sharing of the link.

The survey asked about seven options for receiving test results, other than face to face with a clinician: a password-protected patient web portal, personal voicemail, personal email, letter, home phone voicemail, fax and text message.

For STI results, the majority—51%—preferred secure patient portals. This method was also the most popular choice for genetic test results, preferred by 46%.

For less sensitive results like cholesterol screenings, there were four options that at least half of patients would be comfortable using: letter, voicemail on their personal phone, email or password-protected website.

Limitations of the study include its use of hypothetical situations in a survey, the authors acknowledge in the Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine. The survey distribution method also didn’t allow researchers to gauge a response rate.

Even so, the results may help improve how doctors communicate with patients, the authors argue.

This may be particularly true for younger patients who are used to doing many other tasks, such as banking, online, said Mechelle Sanders, a researcher at the University of Rochester who wasn’t involved in the study.

Page: 1 2 | Single Page
Share: 

Filed under:EMRsTechnology Tagged with:patient communicationtestswebsite

Related Articles

    Rheuminations: New Rules for Rheumatologists

    April 1, 2013

    Transparent hospital costs, salary caps for senior hospital executives, and no more faxes top one rheumatologist’s wish list for revised healthcare rules

    Online Portals Can Function as Important Physician–Patient Communication Tools

    February 16, 2016

    Patient portals are online programs and applications that help patients and physicians interact. Although there are many different implementations, most will have some sort of messaging component to help with communication between the doctor and the patient, as well as access to at least some elements of the chart, such as test results. “Patients should…

    Tips to Access Journals Online

    June 1, 2008

    Online access to Arthritis & Rheumatism and Arthritis Care & Research is a member benefit of the ACR and the ARHP. In order to use this benefit, you must activate your online access by creating a login specifically for the journals through a one-time registration process. Here is a Q&A to help you access journals online.

    Uneven Access & Privacy Issues Hamper Electronic Patient Healthcare Information Sharing

    May 5, 2020

    (Reuters Health)—Patient portals at U.S. hospitals leave a lot to be desired in terms of privacy when individuals want to share access with an informal caregiver, a new study finds. At nearly half of 102 hospitals included in the study, personnel advised that patients share their account password to give access to a family member…

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences