Video: Every Case Tells a Story| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

Physical Assessment of Chronic Fatigue Syndrome: It Just May Work

Lara C. Pullen, PhD  |  January 15, 2018

Physicians acknowledge that it can be difficult to diagnose chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis (CFS/ME). No universally accepted method of diagnosis exists, and the disorder can present in many different ways.

One school of thought posits that CFS/ME is primarily a disorder of lymphatic drainage of the central nervous system. With that in consideration, practitioners in the U.K. developed the Perrin technique, which diagnoses and treats CFS/ME based on a series of physical signs. New research supports the idea that these physical signs may accurately identify patients with CFS/ME.

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Lucy Hives, research assistant at the University of Central Lancashire in the U.K., and colleagues found that a diagnosis of CFS/ME by physical assessment was consistent with a diagnosis by more established techniques. Their results, published in the Nov. 13, 2017, of BMJ Open, suggest that only two physical signs are needed to diagnose CFS/ME: tender coeliac plexus and postural/mechanical disturbance of the thoracic spine.

The small single-center study included 94 individuals who were 18–60 years old. The study included both people with a prior diagnosis of CFS/ME (n=52) and healthy controls with no symptoms of CFS/ME (n=42). Patients with CFS/ME had previously been formally diagnosed at a National Health Service hospital specialized clinic. The investigators did not collect data on the severity of symptoms of CFS/ME in these patients, nor on how long the patients had had CFS/ME.

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

In the study, three types of practitioners were tasked with diagnosing CFS/ME: an allied health professional with expertise in the Perrin technique, an allied health professional newly trained in the Perrin technique and a physician. Allied health professionals diagnosed CFS/ME using five signs: postural/mechanical disturbances of the thoracic spine, breast varicosities, tender Perrin’s point, tender coeliac plexus and dampened cranial flow.

The investigators found that allied health professionals who were experienced in the use of the Perrin technique were more accurate in diagnosing CFS/ME (88%) than were allied health professionals who were newly trained in the Perrin technique (69%). Experienced allied health professionals successfully identified healthy controls 83% of the time, and inexperienced allied health professionals successfully identified healthy controls 86% of the time. The authors conclude that, although both types of allied health professionals used the same technique, the newly trained allied health professionals struggled more frequently in the identification of all five physical signs.

The physician had more trouble diagnosing CFS/ME than did the allied health professionals, diagnosing CFS/ME in only 63% of participants with confirmed CFS/ME when using standard clinical neurological and rheumatological examination. From this finding, the authors conclude that the clinical neurological and rheumatological assessment had poor diagnostic utility relative to the Perrin technique.

However, the allied health professionals did not always agree on the presence of the five clinical signs. Overall, the researchers found that the accuracy for both allied health professionals was highest (88.3% for the experienced allied health professional and 80.9% for the inexperienced allied health professional) when using tests for only two signs: tender coelic plexus and postural/mechanical disturbances of the thoracic spine. The authors conclude that an allied health professional can quickly and simply examine for these physical signs and, thus, efficiently screen for CFS/ME.

They call for future studies to optimize the set of symptoms used for diagnosis.


Lara C. Pullen, PhD, is a medical writer based in the Chicago area.

Reference

  1. Hives L, Bradley A, Richards J, et al. Can physical assessment techniques aid diagnosis in people with chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis? A diagnostic accuracy study. BMJ Open. 2017 Nov 13;7(11):e017521. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017521.

Page: 1 2 | Multi-Page
Share: 

Filed under:Conditions Tagged with:chronic fatigue syndromeDiagnosismyalgic encephalomyelitisPerrin technique

Related Articles

    Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Redefined

    June 15, 2015

    Image Credit: THPStock/SHUTTERSTOCK.COM A report from the Institute of Medicine that gives new diagnostic criteria for myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) and recommends a new name for the disorder received mixed reviews from rheumatologists and other physicians.1 “Diagnosing ME/CFS often is a challenge … the new diagnostic criteria will make it easier for clinicians to…

    A Rose by Any Other Name: Why clinicians & patients prefer the term myalgic encephalomyelitis & other updates on chronic fatigue syndrome

    September 26, 2017

    A session at the FOCIS 2017 meeting examined the current challenges and understanding of chronic fatigue syndrome, also called myalgic encephalomyelitis, in the hope of stimulating new approaches to deciphering the disease’s mechanistic and immunological underpinnings…

    Chronic Fatigue Syndrome: Why Myalgic Encephalomyelitis Is the Preferred Term and More

    October 17, 2017

    Tashatuvango / shutterstock.com CHICAGO—Joseph Breen, PhD, program officer at the National Institutes of Health in Bethesda, Md., opened the chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) session at the Federation of Clinical Immunology Societies (FOCIS) 2017 meeting by asking presenters to describe the current state of the science to the key immunology stakeholders gathered in the room. The…

    Chronic Fatigue Syndrome: Are There Different Phenotypes?

    December 18, 2017

    New research has examined the autonomic parameters of patients with chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) using the DePaul Symptom Questionnaire to place patients on a disease spectrum. Researchers found different groups of CFS patients had different levels of autonomic dysfunction and cognitive impairment, suggesting that different CFS criteria may diagnose a spectrum of disease severities and different CFS phenotypes…

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences