Video: Every Case Tells a Story| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

President’s Perspective: New ACR Lupus Initiative Program Helps Identify and Eliminate Bias in Rheumatology Practices

Audrey B. Uknis, MD  |  Issue: May 2013  |  May 1, 2013

My colleagues demonstrated an openness, not only to share these examples with us, but also to question their preconceived ideas. They serve as role models for us in their willingness to become self-aware and to take a corrective course when unconscious bias is brought to their attention. It begins with awareness.

We Can Work to Stop Bias in Our Practices

The ACR has taken a leadership role in bringing attention to this issue. Thanks to the vision and commitment of past president and ACR master David Wofsy, public health researcher and Atlanta rheumatologist Sam Lim, and ACR staff members Lisa Amaker, Sheryl McCalla, and Robin Campbell, we’re off to an impressive start. With a grant from the United States Department of Health and Human Services’ Office of Minority Health, and a charter to reduce health disparities in lupus care, the ACR’s Lupus Initiative is developing critically important educational tools and resources.

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

This month, The Lupus Initiative is launching a curriculum and a suite of resources designed to bring attention to health care disparities, including the effects that conscious and unconscious bias can have on patient care. The Lupus Initiative partnered with Georgetown University’s National Center for Cultural Competence to create an online CME series titled, Conscious and Unconscious Biases in Healthcare: Focus on Lupus. The series provides a wealth of thought-provoking essays and tools that you can use to assess your level of unconscious bias. It also provides a set of simple steps that providers can take to bring awareness to bias and mitigate its effects. The new CME series will assist you in getting started and creating an action plan for tackling this very important issue. You can access this online CME at www.thelupusinitiative.org. Some initial steps that you can take include:

  • Acknowledge and accept the existence of bias, its manifestations, and its effects.
  • Know that biases can be interrupted.
  • Assume individual responsibility to address bias without assignment of guilt or blame.
  • Engage in self-reflection and self-assessment.

Most of us are aware that health disparities exist. It is a complex issue, with many factors accounting for disparities in outcomes. As healthcare professionals, it is our responsibility to strive for unbiased care, minimizing and hopefully eliminating bias as a factor that may lead to health disparities. When we equip ourselves and our staffs to be alert to the potential for bias and its effects, we can provide better care and help our patients achieve better outcomes. We may discover that a patient who did not follow through on a course of treatment was not willfully noncompliant, but failed to understand instructions because of a language barrier; perhaps they needed a translator. Or perhaps they speak the same language you do but needed the information communicated differently, by a person with whom they feel comfortable.

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Page: 1 2 3 | Single Page
Share: 

Filed under:Practice SupportPresident's Perspective Tagged with:AC&RCMELupusPractice Management

Related Articles

    Cost of a Free Lunch

    May 1, 2007

    Much is made of pharma’s influence on CME—but do we really know what this educational funding buys?

    G-Stock Studio / shutterstock.com

    Conquering Systemic Racism in Medicine

    October 19, 2020

    2020 has not only borne witness to a global pandemic, but also to increasing fervor in the fight for racial equity. In a wave of opposition to the systemic racism in the U.S., people have been in the streets demonstrating and protesting against social injustice and have taken to social media to promote political action….

    Racial Bias Found in Pain Assessment, Management, Treatment Recommendations by Clinicians

    October 10, 2016

    In the world of evidence-based medicine, basing diagnosis and treatment decisions on belief instead of data seems anachronistic. And yet … clinicians are human, and humans live in culture, and culture is formed by beliefs, and beliefs (consciously or unconsciously) drive perception and, often, action. So a new study shining a light on racial bias…

    Medical Schools Address Bias, Diversity, Inclusion in Variety of Ways

    May 16, 2017

    “What are you?” A faculty member at the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) School of Medicine posed this question to a resident while attending rounds. Both were portraying a scene involving micro-aggression during Differences Matter, a three-day orientation for first-year medical students. ad goes here:advert-1ADVERTISEMENTSCROLL TO CONTINUEOn the program’s first day, students are introduced…

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences