Video: Every Case Tells a Story| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

Prior Authorization Requests Delay or Prevent Delivery of Needed Meds

Richard Quinn  |  Issue: June 2015  |  March 27, 2015

A rheumatologist has penned a screed against prior authorization (PA).

In a piece posted on the popular online portal, Rheumatology Network, Christopher Adams, MD, chief of rheumatology at the East Alabama Rheumatology Center in Opelika, Ala., and the managed care and governmental affairs liaison for the Alabama Society of Rheumatic Diseases, says he wants to bring attention to the issue of PBMs asking for prior approval before green-lighting patients to receive prescribed medications or outright refusing to provide certain drugs. He expanded on his thoughts earlier this month in an e-mail interview with The Rheumatologist.

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Question: You write the burden of (PA) paperwork “hinders us physicians from fighting disease.” Has it really gotten that bad?
Answer: It is far worse than ‘that bad.’ Yesterday, my PA medical assistant spent 95 minutes on hold on the telephone and then was talked down to like a misbehaving schoolchild by [a] PBM representative. I got on the phone and asked why it took all this time to get a patient the medicine that she had taken without administrative hassle for years. The PBM rep tersely instructed me that they have a ‘procedure that must be followed,’ so I asked if their procedure was more important than treating the patient.

Q: Why do you believe it has gotten worse in recent years?
A: Health insurance companies have carved out pharmacy benefits from major medical and other coverage, so there is nothing to buffer cost increases within this bucket of money. The industry appears desperate to take whatever means is necessary to control costs, even if it means denying patients from getting medicines that they have been successfully treated with for years.

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Q: What should the rank-and-file rheumatologist be aware of here that maybe they’re not thinking of, in terms of how important this issue is?
A: The basic problem is control. Doctors are still held liable for patient outcomes, but now the decisions about treatment are being wrangled from the exam room to the boardroom. What rheumatologists need to understand is that we have entered a new era with the threshold of disease control and remission for several conditions that we treat, [and] pressures from PBMs are preventing us from implementing [some] dramatically effective therapies.

What’s Next?
Dr. Adams believes decisions from PBMs should be transparent, conform to standard-of-care practice guidelines and provide timely responses. To help raise further awareness of how this practice negatively affects patient care and to pressure PBMs, he also suggests encouraging patients to lobby their senators and representatives and insurance companies.(posted 3/27/15)

Page: 1 2 | Single Page
Share: 

Filed under:Practice Support Tagged with:Health InsuranceMedicationpatient carePractice Managementprior authorizationrheumatologist

Related Articles

    Bridge the Gap Between Goal and Attainment

    May 1, 2010

    Use motivational interviewing to facilitate behavior change for your clients

    High Cost of Specialty Drugs Demands Action

    July 6, 2021

    Amid rising drug costs and the growing influence of pharmacy benefit managers on patient care decisions, physicians are increasingly called upon to advocate for affordable, evidence-based treatments for their patients.

    Florida Law Puts Drug Pricing by Pharmacy Benefit Managers Under a Microscope Once Again

    August 8, 2022

    As of July 1, a Florida bill increases oversight of pharmacy benefit managers and offers some protection for pharmacies. However, the legislation has limited effects on patients and providers, highlighting the need for additional reform.

    Rheumatologists Air Frustrations with Pharmacy Benefit Managers at Annual Meeting

    January 19, 2018

    SAN DIEGO—Pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) and their impact on drug prices and access to high-cost medications by the patients rheumatologists treat was a major theme at the 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting Nov. 3–8. In one session, industry experts tried to clarify the role for prior authorizations and drug formulary policies and explored ways to constructively…

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences