The Rheumatologist
COVID-19 News
  • Connect with us:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube
  • Feed
  • Home
  • Conditions
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • SLE (Lupus)
    • Crystal Arthritis
      • Gout Resource Center
    • Spondyloarthritis
    • Osteoarthritis
    • Soft Tissue Pain
    • Scleroderma
    • Vasculitis
    • Systemic Inflammatory Syndromes
    • Guidelines
  • Resource Centers
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis Resource Center
    • Gout Resource Center
    • Psoriatic Arthritis Resource Center
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis Resource Center
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Resource Center
  • Drug Updates
    • Biologics & Biosimilars
    • DMARDs & Immunosuppressives
    • Topical Drugs
    • Analgesics
    • Safety
    • Pharma Co. News
  • Professional Topics
    • Ethics
    • Legal
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Career Development
      • Certification
      • Education & Training
    • Awards
    • Profiles
    • President’s Perspective
    • Rheuminations
    • Interprofessional Perspective
  • Practice Management
    • Billing/Coding
    • Quality Assurance/Improvement
    • Workforce
    • Facility
    • Patient Perspective
    • Electronic Health Records
    • Apps
    • Information Technology
    • From the College
    • Multimedia
      • Audio
      • Video
  • Resources
    • Issue Archives
    • ACR Convergence
      • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Resource Center
      • Rheumatoid Arthritis Resource Center
      • Gout Resource Center
      • Abstracts
      • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence Home
    • American College of Rheumatology
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Research Reviews
    • ACR Journals
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
    • Rheumatology Image Library
    • Treatment Guidelines
    • Rheumatology Research Foundation
    • Events
  • About Us
    • Mission/Vision
    • Meet the Authors
    • Meet the Editors
    • Contribute to The Rheumatologist
    • Subscription
    • Contact
  • Advertise
  • Search
You are here: Home / Articles / Pros, Cons of Provider-Based Conversions

Pros, Cons of Provider-Based Conversions

September 15, 2015 • By Steven M. Harris, Esq.

  • Tweet
  • Email
Print-Friendly Version / Save PDF
Pros, Cons of Provider-Based Conversions

Image Credit: empics/shutterstock.com

When the local hospital approaches you about selling your practice and converting it to a provider-based outpatient department, you may want to hear them out. There are many benefits to becoming a department of the hospital, but what would it mean for you and the practice you worked tirelessly to build?

You Might Also Like
  • Rheumatology Practice Merger Pros and Cons
  • Rheumatologists Weigh Pros, Cons of Working in Academia
  • The Pros & Cons of Combining Different Specialties Under One Roof
Explore This Issue
September 2015
Also By This Author
  • Best Practices for COVID-19 Regulatory Waivers, Relief Funding & Audits

What Does It Mean to Be “Provider Based”?

A provider-based facility is a department of the hospital and provides healthcare services under the name, ownership, administrative and financial control of the hospital. Clinical services are billed under the hospital’s provider number. The department comprises the physical facility and the personnel and equipment needed to deliver the healthcare services.

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

When a physician practice is converted to a provider-based department of a hospital, the hospital can bill Medicare for the technical component of the services provided, which is reimbursed at a much higher rate than if billed by an independent physician practice. The reason for the difference is that when a hospital is reimbursed for the technical component, the payment includes the additional overhead and expenses associated with operating a hospital (e.g., administrative costs, maintenance expenses and the cost of housekeeping).

You Agree; Now What?

Saying goodbye to your brand. One of the provider-based requirements is that the facilities be held out to the public as departments of the hospital, such that when patients enter the facilities, they are aware that they are visiting a department of the hospital and will be billed accordingly. After years of building your brand, the hospital’s name and trademark will now be the face of the practice. This can be confusing for patients. However, it can also be a good thing, because patients often find comfort in knowing that their doctor’s office is now part of a larger platform for delivering professional services.

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Employment arrangements. Once a physician practice converts to provider based, all non-physician staff must be employed by the hospital. However, physicians have flexibility when it comes to their own employment arrangements and can decide between hospital employment and a professional services arrangement. They often believe they will make more money in private practice than as a hospital employee, but that is not always the case. There are many advantages to being a hospital-employed physician, including:

  • Eliminating overhead and other operating expenses;
  • Not having to pay costly malpractice insurance premiums;
  • Taking advantage of the hospital’s employee benefits package, including vacation time and health insurance; and
  • Eliminating the stress of running your own practice.

These factors can lead to greater earning capacity as a hospital-based physician. So why doesn’t every physician close their practice and head over to the local hospital? The answer is often freedom. As hospital employees, physicians are bound to the hospital’s policies and procedures and often lose the autonomy they enjoyed in private practice. They become subject to hospital ownership changes and lose control over their staff, who must be employed by the hospital and report to its administrators.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 | Single Page

Filed Under: Legal, Practice Management, Professional Topics, Quality Assurance/Improvement Tagged With: administrative, Healthcare, Outcomes, patient care, Practice Management, provider-basedIssue: September 2015

You Might Also Like:
  • Rheumatology Practice Merger Pros and Cons
  • Rheumatologists Weigh Pros, Cons of Working in Academia
  • The Pros & Cons of Combining Different Specialties Under One Roof
  • Trainees Discuss Pros, Cons of Rheumatology Residency Rotation

Simple Tasks

Learn more about the ACR’s public awareness campaign and how you can get involved. Help increase visibility of rheumatic diseases and decrease the number of people left untreated.

Visit the Simple Tasks site »

ACR Convergence

Don’t miss rheumatology’s premier scientific meeting for anyone involved in research or the delivery of rheumatologic care or services.

Visit the ACR Convergence site »

Rheumatology Research Foundation

The Foundation is the largest private funding source for rheumatology research and training in the U.S.

Learn more »

The Rheumatologist newsmagazine reports on issues and trends in the management and treatment of rheumatic diseases. The Rheumatologist reaches 11,500 rheumatologists, internists, orthopedic surgeons, nurse practitioners, physician assistants, nurses, and other healthcare professionals who practice, research, or teach in the field of rheumatology.

About Us / Contact Us / Advertise / Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

  • Connect with us:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube
  • Feed

Copyright © 2006–2022 American College of Rheumatology. All rights reserved.

ISSN 1931-3268 (print)
ISSN 1931-3209 (online)