Video: Every Case Tells a Story| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

Reading Rheum

Gail C. Davis, RN, EdD; Eric S. Schned, MD  |  Issue: July 2007  |  July 1, 2007

Intervention: Initial therapy with oral prednisone tapered from 15 mg/d to 0 mg/d over 16 weeks according to a standard protocol, plus infusions of placebo or infliximab, 3 mg/kg of body weight, at Weeks 0, 2, 6, 14, and 22.

Measurements: The primary efficacy end point was the proportion of patients without relapse or recurrence through Week 52. Secondary outcomes were the proportion of patients no longer taking prednisone, the number of relapses and recurrences, the duration of prednisone therapy, and the cumulative prednisone dose.

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Results: Four patients (three in the infliximab group and one in the placebo group) did not complete the trial. The proportion of patients who were free of relapse and recurrence at 52 weeks did not differ between groups (six of 20 patients [30%] in the infliximab group versus 10 of 27 patients [37%] in the placebo group; adjusted risk difference, -3 percentage points [95% CI, -31 to 24 percentage points]; p=0.80). In a sensitivity analysis that included dropouts, the best-case scenario yielded a difference of 5 percentage points (CI, -21 to 31 percentage points) between the groups. The secondary outcomes at Weeks 22 and 52 did not differ between the groups.

Limitations: The study had a small sample and a short follow-up. A low dosage of infliximab was used, and the prednisone dosage was rapidly tapered.

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Conclusions: Although too small to be definitive, the trial provides evidence that adding infliximab to prednisone for treating newly diagnosed PMR is of no benefit and may be harmful. If there is benefit, it is unlikely to be large.

Commentary

The need for meaningful alternatives to GCCs in treating GCA and PMR is painfully obvious to rheumatologists. Eighty percent of patients with GCA will experience at least one adverse event due to GCCs and overall morbidity of this therapy is high, especially in an older population. Unfortunately, studies to find safer treatments, such as methotrexate, to reduce the dose or duration of GCC therapy and lead to prolonged remissions have been disappointing to date.1,2

Growing knowledge of the role cytokine mediators in the vessels affected by GCA, including TNF, raises the possibility that the TNF-a inhibitors might be effective steroid-sparing agents. Several case reports suggested that infliximab could produce remissions in patients with GCA and PMR.3,4 Case studies are often encouraging—although sometimes misleading because of the bias in publishing positive results. Randomized trials are always important in determining the true value of a therapy, often dashing the hopes provided by the preliminary reports.

Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 | Single Page
Share: 

Filed under:Research Rheum Tagged with:LiteraturePainReading Rheum

Related Articles

    Is Acupuncture for Pain a Placebo Treatment?

    November 1, 2010

    An examination of the evidence

    Two Inflammatory Conditions—Polymyalgia Rheumatica and Giant Cell Arteritis—Share Clinical Connection

    March 1, 2013

    Polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) and giant cell arteritis (GCA) have common clinical and epidemiologic links, but they need not occur synchronously

    Permanent Vision Loss in Late Giant Cell Arteritis

    October 18, 2018

    Patients with polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) or peripheral arthritis may require extra vigilance during treatment because of a suspected link to giant cell arteritis (GCA) and, potentially, permanent vision loss. “Development of giant cell arteritis after treating polymyalgia or peripheral arthritis: a retrospective case-control study,” a March 2018 study published in The Journal of Rheumatology, suggests…

    Updates on Giant Cell Arteritis

    March 19, 2018

    SAN DIEGO—Recent research tells us more about giant cell arteritis (GCA) to help rheumatologists more accurately diagnose and effectively treat patients with this type of vasculitis. On Nov. 6 at the ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting, three experts explored the latest findings on GCA pathogenesis, diagnostic approaches, imaging modalities and growing treatment options. GCA: What’s Really Happening?…

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences