Video: Every Case Tells a Story| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

Reading Rheum

Daniel Hal Solomon, MD, MPH; Michael M. Ward, MD  |  Issue: June 2007  |  June 1, 2007

Results: Within a 12-month window, 568 patients had 8,686 outpatient encounters with the healthcare system with a mean of 3.41 unique providers per patient associated with a mean of five primary care and six rheumatologist visits. Half did not see a primary care physician and 20% did not see a rheumatologist during six-month periods, despite their use of potentially toxic drugs, a mean of four comorbidities, and progressive RA. Over the course of 24 months, 29% of patients changed their primary care provider, and 15% changed their rheumatologist. Patients were moderately impaired with mean SF-12 physical component score 37 (standard deviation, 9).

Conclusion: Patients with RA have frequent encounters with multiple providers and also frequent discontinuity of care. Recognizing the complexity of the care of patients with a chronic disease across multiple dimensions provides an opportunity to better understand challenges and opportunities in delivering high-quality care.

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Commentary

Making decisions on follow-up appointments, asking for consultations, returning patient telephone calls, communicating with primary care physicians, and transferring medical records to other providers are part of the mechanics of clinical practice. Although most of us live it on a daily basis, rarely do we step back and consider how these efforts fit into the overall pattern of patient care. This study attempts to do just that in a survey of healthcare use by 568 patients with RA.

In a prodigious effort of patient interviews and medical record reviews conducted in 2001, the investigators cataloged the type and frequency of contacts these patients had with healthcare providers during one year.

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Some findings were not surprising. Patients with RA are frequent users of healthcare, although the annual number of visits among patients in this study (mean of 4.5 visits to a primary care provider and 5.5 visits to a rheumatologist) was slightly lower than those of past studies. Eighty-six percent of patients saw a rheumatologist during the year before the survey, and 69% did so during the three months before the survey. This frequency was not likely skewed by the study’s source population or recruitment strategy, as most subjects were identified from insurance claims or laboratory databases, and only 15% were recruited from rheumatology practices.

Other findings are more interesting. More than 20% of patients had at least one appointment cancellation or no-show (to any provider, not necessarily to rheumatologists). Only about 20% had at least one visit with a physician assistant or nurse practitioner. These observations suggest opportunities to improve the efficiency of care. In contrast, 37% of patients had a visit that was classified as unscheduled, urgent, or emergent.

Page: 1 2 3 4 | Single Page
Share: 

Filed under:ConditionsResearch RheumRheumatoid Arthritis Tagged with:mortalitypatient careReading RheumResearchRheumatoid Arthritis (RA)TNF antagonistTreatment

Related Articles

    Reading RHEUM

    November 1, 2006

    Handpicked Reviews of Contemporary Literature

    TNF Blockade for SLE

    September 1, 2010

    Reckless approach versus missed opportunity?

    Do Bisphosphonates Reduce Cardiovascular-Related Mortality?

    May 13, 2021

    It is well known that hip fractures are associated with significant morbidity and mortality: Mortality increases 15–25% in the year following a hip fracture.1–5 We know that treating osteo­porosis prevents fractures and improves patient survival. But is there a relationship beyond this? Several studies have found that bisphosphonate therapy is associated with a reduction in…

    Are We Playing It Safe?

    October 1, 2010

    Tumor necrosis factor alpha inhibition and the risk of solid malignancies

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences