Video: Every Case Tells a Story| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

Rheumatologist Elected to Key AMA Committee That Helps CMS Set Medicare Reimbursements

Leslie Mertz, PhD  |  February 10, 2025

Dr. Laing adds, “Without participation in the RUC process, the only avenue available for expressing your concern over evaluation of a code is to meet with or write directly to the CMS. In other words, you are an individual voice instead of a collective voice, and the collective voice is much more powerful in terms of obtaining a value that you think fairly represents what you do. That’s really what it comes down to. And that’s why we need to be part of the RUC.”

The ACR asks rheumatologists to join or renew membership in the AMA so this work may continue. Rheumatology’s ability to be involved in AMA committees and the AMA House of Delegates is dependent upon enough ACR members also being members of the AMA, so every single person who is a member of both the ACR and the AMA is helping with these efforts. Visit the AMA’s membership site to join or renew your AMA membership and receive valuable membership benefits along with helping to advance rheumatology.

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Leslie Mertz, PhD, is a freelance science journalist based in northern Michigan.

 

Help yourself and your patients: Fill out the RUC survey!

To have a say in CMS reimbursement rates, fill out your RUC surveys. That is the plea from rheumatologists serving on the American Medical Association’s Relative Value Update Committee (RUC). The RUC heavily relies on the surveys to make its case to the CMS about appropriate valuation for physician services and procedures.

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

“RUC surveys are not like the ubiquitous surveys that you get from a store or website customer service that probably never go anywhere or do anything. The RUC surveys really do matter,” says RUC member and rheumatologist Luke Barré, MD, MPH, RhMSUS.

When a CMS code comes up for reevaluation or initial evaluation, each affected professional society, including the ACR, sends out a RUC survey to its members. “The survey participation rate, which varies depending on the code’s use by each society’s members, is scrutinized carefully by the RUC to determine its validity,” explains RUC member and rheumatologist Tim Laing, MD, MACR. “If we don’t meet that threshold, the RUC will deem the survey results unreliable, and our opinions won’t count.”

Dr. Barré adds, “Everybody gets survey fatigue, but a RUC survey is one where filling it out—and filling it out honestly—is ultimately going to impact your bottom line. With the RUC survey, the difference of a few people responding or not responding can make the difference in getting an appropriate CMS reimbursement code. So, yes, filling out these surveys really matters.”

Page: 1 2 3 4 | Single Page
Share: 

Filed under:InsuranceLegislation & AdvocacyPractice Support Tagged with:AMA Relative Value Update Committee (RUC)Medicare Reimbursement

Related Articles

    The Relative Value Update Process: Your Input Makes a Difference

    November 5, 2021

    Selected ACR members will be invited to participate in a survey from the AMA Relative Value Update Committee. If you do, respond by the listed date. Data from these surveys helps set Medicare and other payer reimbursement rates.

    How Rheumatologists Are Paid: Luke Barré, MD, Joins AMA Committee That Helps Shape Physician Fee Schedule

    October 7, 2022

    The American Medical Association’s Relative Value Update Committee advises the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services on appropriate reimbursement rates for specialty services. Luke Barré, MD, MPH, RhMSUS, is learning the ropes as the ACR’s newest representative.

    How to Decipher the American Medical Association’s Billing, Coding Processes

    April 15, 2016

    The American Medical Association consists of two key groups: 1) the Relative Value Scale Update Committee (RUC), which oversees the annual updates to the physician work relative values, and 2) the Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) Editorial Panel, which assigns new or revised codes in the CPT book. The CPT Process Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) was…

    What Do Your Patients Think About You?

    May 9, 2012

    Why your practice needs patient-satisfaction surveys

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences