Video: Every Case Tells a Story| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

Ethics Forum: Unexpected Ethical Issues in Private Practice, Clinical Research

Donah Zack Crawford, MA, Jill Johnson, MD, Neal K. Moskowitz, MD, PhD, & James Udell, MD  |  Issue: July 2016  |  July 14, 2016

Patients often request our aid on applications for disability, Supplemental Security Income, FMLA, handicap parking placards and protection from utility shutoffs. Some of these requests seem like patients are trying to “milk the system.”

Patients often request our aid on applications for disability, Supplemental Security Income, FMLA, handicap parking placards and protection from utility shutoffs. Some of these requests seem like patients are trying to “milk the system.”

She now presented with paperwork from the financial aid office of her daughter’s college requesting a letter from the physician treating the parent of the student, stating that the parent will never be able to work in any capacity in the future. We were told that failure to make such a statement would affect her daughter’s ability to obtain an education. Yet her condition is treatable, and her disability potentially quite temporary; she could reasonably expect to return to full function with effective treatment.

On the other hand, her disease has not yet been well controlled, and she’s been unable to work, earn an income or pay for her daughter’s education. It is our responsibility to do what we can to correct that situation.

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

As rheumatologists, we are often beset with paperwork requests from patients to aid with applications for disability, Supplemental Security Income (SSI), FMLA, handicap parking placards and protection from utility shutoffs. Some of these requests are legitimate, and others seem like patients “milking the system.” Doing the right thing can seem like a difficult balance.

Once you’ve considered the question carefully, don’t hesitate to draw a line in the sand.

Case 6

Other kinds of ethical dilemmas also arise—ones in which everything is done right, but still ends up feeling wrong. For years, we treated a man who had been the director of the camp that his treating physician had attended every summer as a boy. The patient was a hero to his rheumatologist and was a well-respected, well-spoken and intelligent educator. His visits were a highlight of the week. Over the years, his cognitive function declined, and detailed evaluation confirmed the presence of progressive dementia. He asked his rheumatologist to speak to his children about his need to relocate close to them so he could have more help and support. The patient and his family were grateful that his rheumatologist was the one who informed them of the diagnosis, but even now, several years later, it didn’t seem entirely right.

His rheumatologist still remembers thinking, “Wait, what? You want me to do what?”

The Right Choice

In clinical practice, our office is way ahead of the curve: We implemented electronic medical records almost a decade ago. Our clinical systems promote efficiency, quality and safety. We have organized ways of doing things. The physicians have good communication and working relationships with other providers, and everyone is on the same page—at least that’s usually the case.

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Page: 1 2 3 4 5 | Single Page
Share: 

Filed under:EthicsPractice SupportResearch Rheum Tagged with:ClinicalEthicspatient carePractice ManagementQualityResearchRheumatic Diseaserheumatologistrheumatology

Related Articles

    Are You Informed About Informed Consent?

    May 1, 2008

    Physicians walk a fine line between informed consent and patient trust

    Ethics Forum: The Ethical Challenges of Recruiting Patients for Clinical Trials

    February 1, 2014

    A successful recruiter raises concerns about balancing friendliness and enthusiasm with legal and ethical constraints when screening human subjects for research

    Updated ACP Ethics Manual Provides 6-Step Approach to Dilemmas

    January 15, 2019

    NEW YORK (Reuters Health)—The 2019 edition of the American College of Physicians (ACP) ethics manual provides a six-step approach to resolving ethical dilemmas and adds or expands sections that address emerging issues in 21st century medicine.1 “The Manual provides succinct guidance on issues that affect the patient-physician relationship, and also issues that have to do…

    AMA Updates Code of Medical Ethics

    January 17, 2017

    Eight years ago, the American Medical Association’s (AMA) Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs embarked on a comprehensive review of the AMA Code of Medical Ethics. What emerged after years of hard effort, intensive feedback and thoughtful revisions was a modernized version of the guide, which the AMA House of Delegates voted to adopt in…

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences