Video: Every Case Tells a Story| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

Updated ACP Ethics Manual Provides 6-Step Approach to Dilemmas

Will Boggs, MD  |  January 15, 2019

NEW YORK (Reuters Health)—The 2019 edition of the American College of Physicians (ACP) ethics manual provides a six-step approach to resolving ethical dilemmas and adds or expands sections that address emerging issues in 21st century medicine.1

“The Manual provides succinct guidance on issues that affect the patient-physician relationship, and also issues that have to do with the physician’s relationship to other clinicians, the physician’s role in society, practice environment issues, and medical teaching and research,” Lois Snyder Sulmasy, JD from the American College of Physicians, Center for Ethics and Professionalism, Philadelphia, tells Reuters Health by email. “Topics are also addressed in more detail in ACP position papers on ethical issues and our ethics case study series.”

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Snyder Sulmasy and Thomas A. Bledsoe, MD, from the Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, R.I.m drafted the Manual’s seventh edition on behalf of the ACP Ethics, Professionalism and Human Rights Committee. As with earlier additions, this updated version asserts that “the physician’s first and primary duty is to the patient.”

To address emerging issues, ACP’s latest ethics manual includes new or expanded sections on electronic communications, telemedicine ethics, electronic health record ethics, precision medicine and genetics, social media and online professionalism, the changing practice environment, population health, physician volunteerism, and research and protection of human subjects.

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

The updated manual also includes a revised method for ethics decision-making. This six-step process begins with assessing the medical situation and proceeds through framing the medical decision and ethical question, determining the principles and interests involved in the ethics question, identifying the participants and their motivations, balancing principles and interests to reach resolution, and considering how the ethical dilemma might have been avoided in the first place.

The section on telemedicine insists that a valid patient-physician relationship should be in place for a professionally responsible telemedicine service to take place. Any sort of telemedicine relationship should adhere to the standard of care required for in-person visits, and the benefits of increased access to care through telemedicine need to be balanced against the risks associated with the loss of the in-person encounter.

Ethical precision medicine and genetics must address issues of patient and physician education, counseling, privacy, confidentiality, cost, the patient’s best interests, and justice. Patients must be informed of the risks, benefits, limitations, and costs of testing before—not after–testing takes place so that they can make well-informed decisions about testing and disclosure of their genetic information.

Page: 1 2 3 | Single Page
Share: 

Filed under:EthicsProfessional Topics Tagged with:EthicsSocial Mediatelemedicine

Related Articles

    The Doctor Will See You Now: Legal & Regulatory Reforms Expand Telemedicine

    March 17, 2020

    In this time of COVID-19, you may be considering ways to deliver routine rheumatologic care via some form of telemedicine. Here are some of the legal considerations.

    Practicing Telemedicine Raises Legal Considerations for Rheumatologists

    July 12, 2016

    With the evolution and advancement of technology, it was only a matter of time before such changes affected the medical industry. Although the concept of telemedicine dates back more than 50 years, emphasis on cost-effective quality healthcare coupled with technological advancements has caused a resurgence of telemedicine in recent years. What constitutes telemedicine largely depends…

    New Recommendations Support Effective Use of Telemedicine in Primary Care

    September 9, 2015

    NEW YORK (Reuters Health)—The American College of Physicians (ACP) has issued a baker’s dozen of recommendations intended to guide the effective use of telemedicine in primary care settings. “The recommendations balance the potential benefits and expanded use of telemedicine with the importance of maintaining the patient-physician relationship and patient safety,” Hilary Daniel from American College…

    Outpatient Medicine in the Post-COVID-19 Era of Telemedicine

    October 19, 2020

    Our hospitals have had their finest hour in the care of acutely ill inpatients during the COVID-19 pandemic, including dealing with allocation decisions fairly and transparently, maximizing good outcomes and remaining cognizant of the enduring ethics of healthcare. The honorable traditions of self-effacing conduct and acceptance of some level of personal risk by healthcare professionals…

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences