Video: Every Case Tells a Story| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

Rheumatology Clinical Registry Debuts This Month

Kurt Ullman  |  Issue: June 2009  |  June 1, 2009

Both private and governmental payors are linking payment to documentation of key quality measures, such as those seen in Medicare’s Physician Quality Reporting Initiative (PQRI). To assist in PQRI reporting and rheumatologists’ own quality-improvement efforts, this month the ACR will release a Web-based quality-measures recording and reporting tool called the Rheumatology Clinical Registry (RCR).

Initially the RCR will have four main functions:

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE
  1. Help members to meet registry reporting requirements to qualify for the PQRI bonus;
  2. Be interoperable with ACR practice improvement modules, which can be used in the American Board of Internal Medicine’s (ABIM’s) rheumatology recertification process;
  3. Assist practices in implementing a standardized patient history; and
  4. Enable participants to benchmark their practice against others nationwide.

“As individual physicians, we are going to be held to certain standards whether we think they are a good idea or not,” says Stanley Cohen, MD, president-elect of the ACR and a rheumatologist in private practice in Dallas. “Short term, we want to give members the tools needed to respond to these standards in a less labor- and time-intensive manner. Longer term, it will allow physicians to become used to accumulating and looking at data to improve practice delivery.”

Easily Accessed

The RCR is a Web-based tool easily accessed by anyone with a computer, Web browser, and Internet connection. The tool’s individual screens have drop-down boxes that can be checked off either at the point of contact or after the visit. The RCR generates clinical reminders based on ACR-approved quality measures for rheumatoid arthritis, gout, osteoporosis, and drug safety, as well as American Medical Association– and Medicare-approved osteoarthritis indicators. Data that are used across several parts of the registry or from one visit to the next persist and need only be entered once.

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

For practices not using computers, paper forms can be printed, completed by the patient or physician, and returned for entry into the RCR. Each record will be confidentially and securely stored, and can be accessed from any Internet-connected computer.

“A modest additional payment is already being paid by Medicare to physicians who document completion of certain quality indicators through the PQRI program,” says Dr. Cohen. “We want to make sure our members have the tools needed to respond to these changes with minimal effort and expense.”

Reporting Functions

The RCR also incorporates a report-generating function. In addition to providing easy filing of PQRI reports—saving time and helping to ensure that complete, accurate PQRI quality data are submitted—modules allow individual physicians or practices to track their adherence to quality-improvement goals. As more practices adopt the RCR, information should become available to benchmark physicians and practices against their peers internal to the practice, regionally, and nationwide.

Page: 1 2 3 | Single Page
Share: 

Filed under:Technology Tagged with:PQRIPracticeQuality

Related Articles

    Practice Page: What PQRI Means to Rheumatologists

    November 1, 2010

    The Physician Quality Reporting Initiative (PRQI) is a voluntary quality reporting program initiated by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) in 2007. CMS provides bonus payments to eligible providers who successfully report on applicable PQRI measures. For 2010, rheumatologists who successfully participate in PQRI can earn an incentive payment of 2% of the…

    Registries and Rheumatology Quality

    June 1, 2010

    The RCR has short- and long-term benefits for the subspecialty

    PQRI Now Includes RA Measures Group

    May 1, 2009

    In 2008, the only Physician Quality Reporting Initiative (PQRI) measure that applied to rheumatoid arthritis (RA) was disease-modifying antirheumatic drug therapy. For 2009, five new RA measures were included, for a total of six measures in the new RA Measures Group. The five new measures were developed in 2008 by the National Committee for Quality Assurance in collaboration with the ACR and the American Medical Association’s Physician Consortium for Performance Improvement and were subsequently adopted by Medicare.

    I Have the Data—Now What?

    April 1, 2010

    Rheumatologists practicing in the current healthcare environment are experiencing unprecedented information flow, data management issues, and a rise in quality designations and pay-for-performance incentive programs. There is increasing pressure on rheumatologists to document or capture treatment concordance with guideline recommendations and best practices and to monitor gaps in care and patient outcomes. Unfortunately, some quality programs are not considered clinically meaningful, and even those that are often bring administrative burdens related to reporting, data aggregation, and analysis.

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences