Video: Every Case Tells a Story| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

Rheumatology Clinical Registry Debuts This Month

Kurt Ullman  |  Issue: June 2009  |  June 1, 2009

“Right now there is just a carrot for achieving quality measures, the 2% bonus on all Medicare payments under PQRI,” says Salahuddin Kazi, MD, chief of rheumatology at the Presbyterian Hospital of Dallas. “But not that far into the future, reporting outcomes and quality measures may become a stick with penalties attached. The registry is one way for rheumatologists to not only become accustomed to what soon may become required, but also to help us control formulation of quality elements used within the specialty.”

One Physician’s Experience

Donald Krause, MD, is medical director for quality improvement at St. Joseph Hospital in Bangor, Maine, and a practicing rheumatologist. He tested an earlier version of the RCR. “It was very easy to use, even though much had to be done manually because of the limitations of our office information system,” he says. “It took my medical assistant about four minutes per patient to identify appropriate patients, insert a checkoff sheet for the diagnosis into the chart, and enter information into the system following the visit. I especially liked that I could make sure that all of the quality indicators were done while the patient was still in front of me and correct anything missing immediately.”

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

With a newer electronic medical record (EMR) system that allows him to sort patients by diagnosis, the input time should be greatly reduced. RCR users without such EMR assistance will be able to use recently added upload functionality within the RCR to pull patients from their billing systems by diagnosis, alleviating some of the initial data entry in much the same way.

Dr. Krause also increased personal compliance with quality indicators and practice guidelines while using the RCR. A self-audit that he compiled saw his completion of indicators increase from 85% immediately before enrolling in the RCR to nearly 100% following RCR use. In addition, the RCR increased his efficiency by standardizing care for individual patients.

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

“We all think we are doing [well] and all think we are doing everything right,” he says. “But when we start looking at specific areas, there may be places where we could do better. I think the RCR will improve clinical care.”

Join the RCR Now!

If you would like to use the RCR in your practice, visit www.rheumatology.org/rcr for more information.

Early Stages of Program

Right now, the RCR is a first step towards what the ACR eventually hopes to achieve. Interoperability with EMR systems is an important ACR goal for the RCR—and demand from rheumatologists who use EMRs will help facilitate that functionality. Rheumatologists interested in contacting their EMR companies to encourage interoperability with the RCR should contact the ACR for information and advice on how to approach their EMR vendors.

Page: 1 2 3 | Single Page
Share: 

Filed under:Technology Tagged with:PQRIPracticeQuality

Related Articles

    Practice Page: What PQRI Means to Rheumatologists

    November 1, 2010

    The Physician Quality Reporting Initiative (PRQI) is a voluntary quality reporting program initiated by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) in 2007. CMS provides bonus payments to eligible providers who successfully report on applicable PQRI measures. For 2010, rheumatologists who successfully participate in PQRI can earn an incentive payment of 2% of the…

    Registries and Rheumatology Quality

    June 1, 2010

    The RCR has short- and long-term benefits for the subspecialty

    PQRI Now Includes RA Measures Group

    May 1, 2009

    In 2008, the only Physician Quality Reporting Initiative (PQRI) measure that applied to rheumatoid arthritis (RA) was disease-modifying antirheumatic drug therapy. For 2009, five new RA measures were included, for a total of six measures in the new RA Measures Group. The five new measures were developed in 2008 by the National Committee for Quality Assurance in collaboration with the ACR and the American Medical Association’s Physician Consortium for Performance Improvement and were subsequently adopted by Medicare.

    I Have the Data—Now What?

    April 1, 2010

    Rheumatologists practicing in the current healthcare environment are experiencing unprecedented information flow, data management issues, and a rise in quality designations and pay-for-performance incentive programs. There is increasing pressure on rheumatologists to document or capture treatment concordance with guideline recommendations and best practices and to monitor gaps in care and patient outcomes. Unfortunately, some quality programs are not considered clinically meaningful, and even those that are often bring administrative burdens related to reporting, data aggregation, and analysis.

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences