Video: Every Case Tells a Story| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

Rheumatology Stakeholders Talk Quality

Peggy Eastman  |  Issue: December 2007  |  December 1, 2007

A number of meeting attendees said the immediate business case for adopting quality measures is weak, especially for practices that don’t have an EHR. EHRs are a cornerstone of CMS’ value-driven healthcare initiative. “This may be a five- to 10-year time horizon,” noted Dr. Solomon, but he agreed with other speakers that quality is ultimately not about money, but about professionalism and what is best for patients.

This is exactly the position taken by Christine Cassel, MD, president of the American Board of Internal Medicine (ABIM). “The reason to support quality is because it’s a core professional value,” she said. Citing RAND data, she noted that, all over the country, patients can only expect to get the recommended treatment half the time; for Medicare patients, it is one-third of the time. “I think we have lots of data showing that we have room for improvement …” she said. “It’s well documented that measurement leads to improvement.”

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Page: 1 2 3 4 | Single Page
Share: 

Filed under:Legislation & AdvocacyPractice SupportQuality Assurance/Improvement Tagged with:Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS)CongressHealthcare ReformMeetingPay-for-PerformanceQuality

Related Articles

    Thick Skin & Solid Research: Necessary Ingredients for Publishing Success

    June 1, 2023

    Scientific publishing requires a commitment to clear writing, concise narratives and a willingness to accept feedback. Daniel Solomon, MD, editor-in-chief of Arthritis & Rheumatology, provides insights into his experiences.

    Quality Advice from Specialty Societies

    December 1, 2008

    The ACR’s Quality Stakeholders’ Summit explored quality initiatives from several medical societies

    Practice Page: What PQRI Means to Rheumatologists

    November 1, 2010

    The Physician Quality Reporting Initiative (PRQI) is a voluntary quality reporting program initiated by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) in 2007. CMS provides bonus payments to eligible providers who successfully report on applicable PQRI measures. For 2010, rheumatologists who successfully participate in PQRI can earn an incentive payment of 2% of the…

    Technology and Pay-for-Performance

    March 1, 2010

    Medicare and private payers are increasingly developing programs to reward physicians based on clinical benchmarks. As more payers embrace this approach, practices are looking to technology to help them manage complex reporting requirements.

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences