Video: Every Case Tells a Story| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

State-of-the-Art Approaches to Rheumatic Disease Diagnosis, Management & Treatment

Lara C. Pullen, PhD  |  Issue: March 2019  |  March 19, 2019

Insights into state-of-the-art approaches to rheumatic disease diagnosis, management & treatment CHICAGO—Held during the 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting, the ACR Review Course covered a wide range of topics for rheumatologists—from advances in pain and rheumatic disease management to the intersection of rheumatology and neurology. Session speakers shared insights, as well as state-of-the-art approaches to diagnosis, management and treatment.

Inflammatory Myopathies

Julie J. Paik, MD, MHS, assistant professor of medicine at the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, updated the audience on idiopathic inflammatory myopathies, also known as myositis. She began by reviewing the four main types of idiopathic inflammatory myopathies: dermatomyositis, polymyositis, immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy and inclusion body myositis.

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Dr. Paik then presented the 2017 EULAR/ACR Classification Criteria for Adult and Juvenile IIM and Their Major Subgroups.1 These criteria represent the first update since the original 1975 classification criteria, which were limited because, although they were sensitive, they were not specific.2 Dr. Paik noted these criteria were old and said, “it was time to move on.”

The process of creating new criteria began in 2004 and included 47 rheuma­tology, dermatology, neurology and pediatric clinics worldwide. Experts from these clinics reviewed data from 976 idiopathic inflammatory myopathy patients and 624 non-idiopathic inflammatory myopathy patients who had mimicking conditions. The criteria are intended to aid clinicians in distinguishing myositis from myositis mimickers.

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Sixteen variables are included the final 2017 EULAR/ACR classification criteria. The criteria note the age of onset is important for distinguishing juvenile from adult cases. They detail the importance of muscle biopsy features, such as endomysial infiltration, perimysial and/or pervascular inflammation, perifasicular atrophy and rimmed vacuoles. And they include a discussion of the anti-Jo-1 antibody, which was the only myositis-specific autoantibody readily available in 2004. Dr. Paik highlighted an online calculator that can be used to input all criteria and determine the probability of myositis.

Dr. Paik then described three challenging myositis cases. The first was a description of transcription intermediary factor-1 gamma-positive dermatomyositis. Although these patients have severe skin disease, they are less likely to have interstitial lung disease (ILD), Raynaud’s or arthritis. Unfortunately, they are at an increased risk of cancer. Their disease tends to be refractory, and they should receive age-appropriate malignancy screening. Dr. Paik also reviewed several ongoing clinical trials in dermatomyositis that show promise, and she highlighted the potential of lenabasum as a successful therapy for these patients.

Knee replacement rates in SLE patients have increased sixfold from 1991–2005. This dramatic increase likely reflects the increased health & survivorship of this patient population.

For the second case, Dr. Paik presented the case of a patient with anti-synthetase syndrome (ASyS) with prominent ILD.  Experts now recognize ASyS as a distinct form of myositis, she said, noting that these patients often first present with arthritis. Dr. Paik emphasized the importance of keeping ASyS in the differential when a new patient is evaluated for inflammatory arthritis. ASyS patients commonly progress from inflammatory arthritis to the more recognized triad of myositis, polyarthritis and ILD. Treatment should be directed at the most active organ manifestation.

Last, Dr. Paik discussed inclusion body myositis, noting the gold standard for the diagnosis is the presence of rimmed vacuoles on muscle biopsy associated with the appropriate pattern of muscle weakness. She highlighted the importance of testing for finger flexor weakness and described a newly discovered autoantibody, NT5C1-A, which is commercially available and positive in up to 60% of patients with inclusion body myositis. She also explained that immunosuppression does not work for these patients and may even be harmful.

Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 | Single Page
Share: 

Filed under:ConditionsMeeting ReportsOsteoarthritis and Bone DisordersPain SyndromesSystemic Lupus Erythematosus Tagged with:2018 ACR/ARHP Annual MeetingFibromyalgiaOsteoporosisperioperative period

Related Articles

    Revising Fibromyalgia: One Year Later

    July 12, 2011

    The 2010 ACR fibromyalgia criteria capture the broader clinical picture and help ensure more appropriate diagnosis and management by primary care

    Autoantibodies in Autoimmune Myopathy

    Autoantibodies in Autoimmune Myopathy

    September 18, 2017

    In recent years, scientists and clinicians have learned a great deal about autoantibodies occurring in idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIMs). These new discoveries have reshaped our understanding of distinct clinical pheno­types in IIMs. Scientists continue to learn more about how these auto­antibodies shape pathophysiology, diagnosis, disease monitoring, prognosis and optimum treatment. Moving forward, these autoantibodies will…

    New Tools for Myositis Diagnosis, Classification & Management

    April 15, 2019

    CHICAGO—At Hot Topics in Myositis, a session at the 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting, three experts discussed new classification criteria for idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM) and offered practical primers on overlap myositis conditions and inclusion body myositis (IBM). New Myositis Classification Criteria After a 10-year development process, the new EULAR/ACR Classification Criteria for Adult and Juvenile…

    Is Fibromyalgia Overdiagnosed?

    October 10, 2016

    Are too many patients diagnosed with fibromyalgia? The co-authors of one new study believe that close to 75% of patients who have received a clinical fibromyalgia diagnosis do not meet the 2010 Preliminary American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Criteria for Fibromyalgia.1 They say these patients are false-positive and may be taking treatments they don’t need….

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences