Video: Every Case Tells a Story| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

Strong Support for Treat-to-Target Strategy in RA Patients

Megan Brooks  |  March 16, 2020

NEW YORK (Reuters Health)—In daily clinical practice, following a treat-to-target (T2T) strategy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) leads to higher rates of remission compared with not following a T2T strategy, according to a longitudinal analysis of real world data.

“The results of the analysis provide direct evidence that following T2T, and particularly sustained T2T, immediately results in a higher likelihood of remission at the next visit, three months later (the longitudinal interpretation of a T2T-strategy),” Dr. Sofia Ramiro of Leiden University Medical Center, Netherlands, tells Reuters Health by email.

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

“Moreover, we have for the first time shown that following T2T is also efficacious in patients with established RA, while previous studies focused on the effect of T2T in patients with early RA,” she says.

The study was published in Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases.1

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

The findings are based on 571 RA patients from the RA BIODAM (BIOmarkers of joint DAMage) cohort who were starting or changing conventional synthetic or biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs. The patients had RA for an average of 6.5 years and were assessed every three months for two years. The total number of visits was 4,356.

At each visit, it was decided whether a patient was treated according to a T2T-strategy with 44-joint disease activity score (DAS44) remission (DAS44 <1.6) as the target. Sustained T2T was defined as T2T followed in at least two consecutive visits. The main outcome was the achievement of DAS44 remission at the subsequent three-month visit.

The correct application of T2T was found in 59% of patient visits. T2T (vs. no T2T) did not yield a higher likelihood of DAS44 remission three months later, but sustained T2T was associated with an increased likelihood of achieving DAS44 remission (odds ratio: 1.19; 95% confidence interval: 1.03–1.39).

Similar results were seen with 28-joint disease activity score-erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-ESR) remission. For more stringent definitions—Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI), Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) and American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism (ACR/EULAR) Boolean remission—T2T was consistently and significantly associated with remission, and sustained T2T had a more pronounced effect on remission.

“Randomized controlled trials have demonstrated the efficacy of T2T approaches in RA,” Dr. Ramiro tells Reuters Health. The current analysis, she said, provides “real-life data from cohorts without strict protocol specifications regarding choice of treatment” and supports the value of T2T in clinical practice.

“Rheumatologists should be encouraged to follow a T2T-strategy to contribute to the achievement of higher rates of remission for their patients,” Dr. Ramiro says.

Page: 1 2 | Single Page
Share: 

Filed under:ConditionsRheumatoid Arthritis Tagged with:Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)Treat-to-Target

Related Articles

    Treat to Target in axSpA

    November 29, 2022

    PHILADELPHIA—Treat to target (T2T) is a common phrase in rheumatology these days—and a welcome one.1 Many of us are familiar with what T2T means in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), but we may be less sure of its meaning in axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA). At ACR Convergence 2022, Alexis Ogdie, MD, associate professor of medicine and epidemiology, University of…

    Treat-to-Target Decisions and Dilemmas

    July 12, 2011

    A better understanding of targets can lead to better outcomes down the road

    Target Remission

    March 1, 2007

    Strategies to identify and track remission in your RA patients

    Study Finds Health & Financial Benefits in AxSpA Treat-To-Target Strategy

    September 11, 2020

    EULAR 2020 e-CONGRESS—In what speakers at the European e-Congress of Rheumatology described as the first treat-to-target and tight control (T2T/TC) strategy trial in axial spondyloarthritis (AxSpA), researchers found such a strategy has both health and financial benefits. In the year-long study—called TICOSPA—centers were randomized to apply either a T2T/TC strategy or care left to the…

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences