The Rheumatologist
COVID-19 News
  • Connect with us:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube
  • Feed
  • Home
  • Conditions
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • SLE (Lupus)
    • Crystal Arthritis
      • Gout Resource Center
    • Spondyloarthritis
    • Osteoarthritis
    • Soft Tissue Pain
    • Scleroderma
    • Vasculitis
    • Systemic Inflammatory Syndromes
    • Guidelines
  • Resource Centers
    • Ankylosing Spondylitis Resource Center
    • Gout Resource Center
    • Psoriatic Arthritis Resource Center
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis Resource Center
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Resource Center
  • Drug Updates
    • Biologics & Biosimilars
    • DMARDs & Immunosuppressives
    • Topical Drugs
    • Analgesics
    • Safety
    • Pharma Co. News
  • Professional Topics
    • Ethics
    • Legal
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Career Development
      • Certification
      • Education & Training
    • Awards
    • Profiles
    • President’s Perspective
    • Rheuminations
    • Interprofessional Perspective
  • Practice Management
    • Billing/Coding
    • Quality Assurance/Improvement
    • Workforce
    • Facility
    • Patient Perspective
    • Electronic Health Records
    • Apps
    • Information Technology
    • From the College
    • Multimedia
      • Audio
      • Video
  • Resources
    • Issue Archives
    • ACR Convergence
      • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Resource Center
      • Rheumatoid Arthritis Resource Center
      • Gout Resource Center
      • Abstracts
      • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence Home
    • American College of Rheumatology
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Research Reviews
    • ACR Journals
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
    • Rheumatology Image Library
    • Treatment Guidelines
    • Rheumatology Research Foundation
    • Events
  • About Us
    • Mission/Vision
    • Meet the Authors
    • Meet the Editors
    • Contribute to The Rheumatologist
    • Subscription
    • Contact
  • Advertise
  • Search
You are here: Home / Articles / Study Looks at Cryoglobulin Detection & Immunological Characteristics

Study Looks at Cryoglobulin Detection & Immunological Characteristics

November 12, 2020 • By Vanessa Caceres

  • Tweet
  • Email
Print-Friendly Version / Save PDF

Lab Transport & Clinical Implications

In addition to clinical insights, one important point addressed in the study is the lab procedures that can contribute to false negative results. “Strict preanalytical conditions must be respected for cryoglobulin detection, conditions of sampling, transport and treatment, to reduce loss of cryoglobulin responsible for false negative results,” the researchers write.

You Might Also Like
  • Cryoglobulins: Quantified & Characterized
  • HCV-Associated Cryoglobulinemic Vasculitis Resolves after Virologic Cure
  • Metabolic Syndrome Linked to Higher Risk for Immunological Disorders
Explore This Issue
November 2020
Also By This Author
  • Autoantibodies Against LINE-1 p40 May Be More Common in Patients with Active SLE

Despite the use of validated procedures, nearly 9% of patients with a negative first test for cryoglobulins tested positive on a second sample. Thus, in the case of negative detection with a suggestive clinical context, repeat cryoglobulin testing is recommended, say the researchers.

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Although it can be challenging to improve sample transportation procedures in a large hospital, it still is important to consistently educate nurses and technicians about cryoglobulin sample detection. The researchers described the best ways to transport blood samples for cryoglobulins in a previous paper (see sidebar, below).2

Takeaways

Rheumatologist Lindsay S. Lally, MD, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, praises the study’s large patient sample. “It adds much to our understanding about the epidemiology and immunologic phenotypes of cryoglobulinemia,” she says. She was surprised that only 8% of the samples originated from rheumatology, but believes this is part of the heterogenous and multisystem nature of cryoglobulinemic vasculitis.

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

“Another notable takeaway is the need to repeat testing if your suspicion is high,” Dr. Lally says. “In this cohort, 9% of patients had initial negative testing and then a positive [cryoglobulin test] on repeat testing. This speaks to high false-negative rates.”

Yet another take-home message, according to Dr. Lally: “We often associate rheumatoid factor positive with mixed cryoglobulinemia, but in this population, only 20% of patients with mixed cryoglobulins had a detectable serum rheumatoid factor, and most of these were patients with hepatitis B or C rather than autoimmune disease,” she says.

What’s Next

Researchers plan to next focus on the link between cryoglobulins and hepatitis C infection, says Dr. Miossec, noting physicians look for a hepatitis C infection only in 30% of cases when cryoglobulin is detected. They also will continue ongoing research into the limitations of detecting rheumatoid factor in type II and type III cryoglobulinemic vasculitis.

ad goes here:advert-3
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Vanessa Caceres is a medical writer in Bradenton, Fla.

How to Transport Blood Samples for Cryoglobulins

Nurses and technicians must receive training in the proper way to transport and handle blood samples intended for cryoglobulin testing.1 Proper sampling, transport and care are critical to lower the chances of a false negative test result. Here are a few tips to follow:

  • Use preheated tubes during blood collection;
  • The sample tube should be carried to the lab in a container that maintains a temperature of 37°C.1,2 This is particularly important for the detection of type I cryoglobulins;
  • A preheated centrifuge creates the best conditions for the detection of cryoglobulins at low concentrations; and3
  • Allow the serum to cryoprecipitate at 4°C for at least three, and preferably seven, days.3

References

  1. Kolopp-Sarda MN, Nombel A, Miossec P. Cryoglobulins today: Detection and immunological characteristics of 1,675 positive samples from 13,439 patients obtained over six years. Arthritis Rheum. 2019 Nov;71(11):1904–1912.
  2. Kolopp-Sarda M-N, Miossec P. Cryoglobulins: An update on detection, mechanisms, and clinical contribution. Autoimmunity Reviews. 2018 May;17(5):457–464.
  3. Vermeersch P, Gijbels K, Mariën G, et al. A critical appraisal of current practice in the detection, analysis, and reporting of cryoglobulins. Clin Chem. 2008 Jan;54(1):39–43.

Pages: 1 2 3 | Single Page

Filed Under: Conditions, Research Reviews, Rheumatoid Arthritis Tagged With: cryoglobulinemia, cryoglobulins, Rheumatoid Factor, Sjögren's syndromeIssue: November 2020

You Might Also Like:
  • Cryoglobulins: Quantified & Characterized
  • HCV-Associated Cryoglobulinemic Vasculitis Resolves after Virologic Cure
  • Metabolic Syndrome Linked to Higher Risk for Immunological Disorders
  • New Study Reveals Limitations in ANA Test Kits for Lupus

American College of Rheumatology

Visit the official website for the American College of Rheumatology.

Visit the ACR »

Simple Tasks

Learn more about the ACR’s public awareness campaign and how you can get involved. Help increase visibility of rheumatic diseases and decrease the number of people left untreated.

Visit the Simple Tasks site »

Rheumatology Research Foundation

The Foundation is the largest private funding source for rheumatology research and training in the U.S.

Learn more »

The Rheumatologist newsmagazine reports on issues and trends in the management and treatment of rheumatic diseases. The Rheumatologist reaches 11,500 rheumatologists, internists, orthopedic surgeons, nurse practitioners, physician assistants, nurses, and other healthcare professionals who practice, research, or teach in the field of rheumatology.

About Us / Contact Us / Advertise / Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

  • Connect with us:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube
  • Feed

Copyright © 2006–2021 American College of Rheumatology. All rights reserved.

ISSN 1931-3268 (print)
ISSN 1931-3209 (online)

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.
This site uses cookies: Find out more.