Video: Every Case Tells a Story| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

Terminate Staff with Caution

Steven M. Harris, Esq.  |  Issue: April 2012  |  April 6, 2012

It is often helpful to speak with a lawyer about the defensibility of the termination from a legal standpoint. Does the employment agreement allow for termination without notice? Is a severance obligation triggered? Do certain facts give rise to concerns of a discrimination, wage, leave, tax, whistleblower, or retaliation claim? Are there continuing obligations that need to be met by the employer or enforced upon the employee? Involving a lawyer in the termination process is good insurance that termination is handled in a proper legal manner.

Understanding the outgoing employee’s immediate concerns is a constructive thought exercise that often facilitates the termination planning. Now more than ever is a challenging time to be unemployed, and reflecting on the human aspects of termination will always be helpful when preparing to deliver tough news while simultaneously seeking to respecting the dignity of the outgoing employee. Take some time to consider the practical realities of the outgoing employee. Does the employer intend on challenging unemployment? The employer will inevitably be asked, so an answer should be prepared in advance. What about severance? Does potential legal exposure make obtaining a release of claims in exchange for severance a priority? In some cases, a little generosity and compassion on the way out prevents significant trouble postemployment.

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Be Direct

Employers often find themselves in trouble as a result of the desire to avoid conflict. A reluctance to be appropriately candid in job evaluations or in identifying poor performance or unacceptable conduct as it occurs raises the possibility of an outgoing employee protesting that he or she was never informed that his or her job was on the line. Frequently, in wrongful termination disputes, an employer’s silence as to poor performance or bad conduct is cast as proof that such performance or conduct was not the real reason for the termination decision. Being polite is counterproductive if it means that a judge and jury are left to wonder whether the termination decision was for legitimate or unlawful reasons.

At the time of termination, the employer is well served by a similar willingness to speak directly to the reasons for severing the relationship. An in-person meeting between a representative of the practice and the outgoing employee, followed by a written statement of what was said at the meeting, should be considered best practice. This discussion, however, should not be a dialogue. A brief statement by the terminator of the reason or reasons for the termination, the terms of separation, and a statement of best wishes will suffice in most situations.

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Page: 1 2 3 | Single Page
Share: 

Filed under:Legal UpdatesPractice SupportWorkforce Tagged with:employmentHarrisLegalPractice Managementrheumatologiststaffing

Related Articles

    Get Employment Records In Writing

    July 9, 2012

    With employees in your medical practice, timely documentation is key.

    Interplay Between Physician Employment Agreements, Medical Staff Bylaws Should Not be Ignored

    October 1, 2013

    Doctors must consider and review bylaws of hospital medical staff privileges when entertaining employment with a hospital or private practice

    Tail Insurance Protects Against Medical Malpractice Claims from Previous Jobs

    February 1, 2013

    Physicians who are resigning, retiring, switching jobs, or are terminated should consider tail insurance to cover malpractice claims brought after they’ve left their current employer

    Tips on Offering Constructive Criticism to Employees

    October 14, 2015

    Telling an employee that they need to improve does not conjure up warm, fuzzy feelings. In fact, many employers dread it and may get gun shy. After all, an employee could take it the wrong way, and the constructive criticism could be ill received. “This is a legitimate fear, because many people have given constructive…

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences