Video: Every Case Tells a Story| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

The ACR Gets Rheumatologists Paid More

Christina D. Downey, MD  |  February 20, 2024

The current path is not sustainable. Congress has the opportunity to throw our physician practices a lifeline by passing H.R. 6683, the Preserving Seniors’ Access to Physicians Act. This bipartisan effort, championed by Rep. Greg Murphy, MD (R-NC), would eliminate the full 3.37% Medicare physician payment cut that went into effect in 2024. The FY2024 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) included an extension of the Medicare sequester that added $2.2 billion to the Medicare Improvement Fund—more than enough to offset an elimination of the 3.37% physician payment cut without adding to the federal deficit. H.R. 6683 is a step in the right direction; however, reformation of the current system is needed for long-term sustainability and protection of patient access to care.

Call for Change

Adjusting for inflation, Medicare physician payments plunged 20% from 2001 to 2021. During the same time, the cost of operating a practice went up 39%. Structural changes are needed to reform the current reimbursement system that requires a balanced budget, a system that is crushing physicians and contributing to the growing medical workforce crisis.4 Some changes championed by the ACR are:

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE
  • Ending the budget neutrality requirement for the Medicare Physician Fee Schedule (MPFS);
  • Adding a permanent, Medical Economic Index (MEI)-based inflationary update to the MPFS, as laid out in the Strengthening Medicare for Patients and Providers Act (H.R. 2474); and
  • Ending the statutory freeze on Medicare physician fee payments related to inflation, currently scheduled through 2025. Under the current model, physician payments are subject to a six-year payment freeze that ends in 2026. When the freeze ends, the statutory update for most physicians will be limited to 0.25% indefinitely, well below even normal inflation rates.

Despite the challenges and seemingly uphill battle facing the sustainability of the Medicare payment system, there are wins worth celebrating. For calendar year 2024, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) finalized a new add-on code, G2211. This code is for outpatient office visits to acknowledge the complexity of ongoing care of a patient’s singular chronic or complex condition, such as systemic lupus erythematosus, systemic sclerosis, vasculitis, rheumatoid arthritis or inflammatory myositis.

The ACR strongly supported the creation of G2211 and led advocacy efforts for its implementation to reimburse cognitive specialists more adequately for the services they are already providing. This new code is billed as an add-on to office/outpatient evaluation and management (E/M) visits. For more information, see the ACR’s Guide to Understanding the New Medicare G2211 Code.

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Page: 1 2 3 | Single Page
Share: 

Filed under:Legislation & AdvocacyOpinionPractice Support Tagged with:Government Affairs Committee (GAC)Medicare reimbursement rate

Related Articles

    The ACR’s Representation in American Medical Association Critical as Review Looms

    March 17, 2017

    There is a saying that if the American Medical Association (AMA) did not exist, we would have to invent it. That is just what Dr. Nathan S. Davis did back in 1845 when he called for a national medical convention and laid the foundation for the establishment of the AMA in 1847. This new group would…

    Pointers for Rheumatologists Considering AMA Membership

    February 3, 2012

    Join the AMA. Don’t join because you agree with everything the AMA does. Join so we, as rheumatologists, will continue to have a voice and make a difference.

    Speak Up: Ask Congress to Block Medicare Reimbursement Cuts

    October 22, 2021

    Rheumatologists may need to downsize and restrict patient care if Congress doesn’t act to block significant cuts to Medicare reimbursement rates totaling 9.75% in 2022.

    Why Keep a Seat at the AMA Table?

    January 18, 2017

    As 2017 unfolds—a year when MACRA begins, lawmakers take steps to dismantle the health reform efforts of the past eight years, and political uncertainty is the rule—it is imperative that the ACR leverage its advocacy agenda by maintaining its seat at the American Medical Association’s (AMA’s) House of Delegates (HOD), says Gary Bryant, MD, FACP…

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences