Video: Every Case Tells a Story| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

The Burden Imposed by Prior Authorization Requirements

Deborah Levenson  |  Issue: February 2025  |  February 9, 2025

Mr. Sahni

Results

The perceived overall approval rate of PAs, including appeals, was 88% for patients, 70% for providers and 73% for private payers. The proportion of respondents reporting overall time to approval taking more than five days was 37% for patients, 27% for providers and 15% for private payers. Patients reported the longest perceived wait times, but also the highest perceived approval rates and lowest perceived burden. Researchers noted that patients don’t usually directly participate in PA.

Clinical provider responses were grouped by reported medical specialties. The perception that overall time to approval (including appeals) took more than five days was highest for plastic surgery providers, at 67% of  respondents, and neurosurgery, at 64%. Specialties reporting the shortest overall approval time were physical and occupational therapy at 8%, with psychiatry/behavioral health/substance abuse at 19% and cardiothoracic surgery at 21%.

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

The researchers also looked at perceived approval rates and times for specific types of treatments, including those requiring appeal. For infused and injected medications, which are common in rheumatology, patients reported a perceived overall approval rate of 81% vs. providers, with a perceived approval rate of 67%. The rate of perceived approvals taking more than five days was 39% for patients vs. 31% for providers.

For oral medications, patients reported a perceived overall approval rate of 84% vs. providers perception of a 68% approval rate. Patients perceived the rate of approvals taking more than five days was 42% vs. providers’ perceptions of 32%.

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Among respondents, provider staffing for PA work varied, with a median of 36% of providers reporting that more than three employees and individuals work on a median of 10 different PA cases weekly. Private payer respondents similarly reported a median of three employees working on a single PA case and that individuals were involved with a median of 20 different cases per week. Provider respondents reported a trend toward staff in lower licensure roles taking on more of the PA work.

Forty-two percent of provider respondents and 13% of private payer respondents identified PA requirements as a high contributor to burnout. The specific aspect most identified by both provider and private payer respondents as contributing to burnout was followup with the other party. Among provider respondents, 92% reported that PA caused delays in patient care, and 14% reported that care was delayed longer than two weeks.

The authors noted some limitations of their work. These include the use of self-reported data prone to recall bias and human error and convenience samples of respondents recruited with monetary incentives.

Page: 1 2 3 4 5 | Single Page
Share: 

Filed under:Patient PerspectivePractice SupportTechnology Tagged with:artificial intelligenceprior authorization

Related Articles
    Georgia Bonney

    Prior Authorization Woes: Barriers to & Delays in Care, Administrative Hassles & Potential Solutions

    August 6, 2021

    As insurers phase out pandemic-related flexibilities, many are raising new obstacles to try to limit their financial exposure.

    What Rheumatologists Need to Know about Payer Audits

    March 15, 2016

    Both government and private payers continue to aggressively monitor providers to prevent and recover overpayments. This is evidenced by the fact that the number of audits conducted in recent years has increased dramatically. A negative audit finding can result in the need to repay five- or seven-figure amounts. Types of Audits Private Payer Audits Private…

    Prior Authorization Is Under Review

    February 10, 2022

    I just couldn’t believe it. Like all of you, I receive many requests to see patients urgently. And like all of you, I can’t possibly accommodate all of those requests. So I triage: I look through the referrals and try to differentiate patients who want to be seen from those who need to be seen….

    Different Payer Audits Require Different Preparation & Response

    June 21, 2018

    For a provider of healthcare services, payer audits are always a possibility. Both government and private payers consistently monitor providers to prevent fraud, overpayment, and improper billing or coding procedures. Audits can be nerve-racking and intimidating, even if a provider is billing correctly. Improper billing can lead to civil and criminal sanctions. To alleviate some…

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences