Video: Every Case Tells a Story| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

The Dual-Target Strategy in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Put Patients First

Ricardo J.O. Ferreira, RN, PhD; Leonard H. Calabrese, DO; & José A.P. Da Silva, MD, PhD  |  Issue: October 2021  |  October 13, 2021

The impressive progress of medical knowledge and technology reinforces our trust in the scientific methodology that made it all possible. However, that progress also creates risks related to the primary goal of medical care: to serve our patients’ interests and enjoyment of life in the best possible way.

In this article we present our views on how the currently prevailing treatment strategy can be taken a step forward to simultaneously sharpen our therapeutic targets in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and foster empathy and patient-centered care. The proposal may be applicable to a variety of conditions, in addition to RA.

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Linda’s Clinical Scenario

“Linda” is a 37-year-old math teacher and mother of two—a 2-year-old and a 4-year-old. She was diagnosed with RA 18 months ago, 10 weeks after her first symptoms appeared. Pain and morning stiffness made it impossible for her to carry out her family duties and kept her out of work for three months. With medication, her symptoms have significantly improved.

Linda is being treated by “Dr. Snow,” who runs a busy, but well-organized and evidence-based, clinic. Every three months, Linda has an appointment and fills in several questionnaires about her disease. She feels lucky to have found Dr. Snow, and he has been pleased with her progress so far.

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Linda’s disease activity has been assessed systematically by support nurses, and a remission target has been consistently pursued, although this was not exactly the subject of shared decision making. Her therapy was stepped up, as recommended, and the results have been positive—until now. Linda’s Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) score has increased beyond the low disease-activity level.

Dr. Snow must now decide whether to switch the biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (bDMARD) Linda has been taking to another agent. Figure 1 shows Dr. Snow’s register of Linda’s disease activity levels, as well as the DMARD scheme followed until today.

Figure 1: Linda’s Disease Activity Evolution & Treatment Scheme
(Legend: bDMARD, biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug; MTX, methotrexate; SDAI, Simplified Disease Activity Index; SLZ, sulfasalazine)
CLICK TO ENLARGE

Treat to Target

The guiding principles of treat to target, described for RA more than a decade ago, are:1

  • Selecting a target (i.e., remission or, at least, low disease activity in every patient) and a method for measuring it;
  • Assessing the target at pre-specified time points (e.g., every three months);
  • Making a commitment to change the therapy if the target is not achieved; and
  • Exercising shared decision making.

These have been incorporated as guiding principles in the EULAR and ACR treatment recommendations for RA since 2010 and 2012, respectively.2,3 These treat-to-target principles represented a major advance in our field, providing the best possible certainty of reducing or halting the progression of joint damage and disability.4

Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 | Single Page
Share: 

Filed under:ConditionsPatient PerspectiveRheumatoid ArthritisSpeak Out Rheum Tagged with:Disease Activity Score (DAS)patient centerednessshared decision makingSpeak Out RheumatologyTreat-to-Target

Related Articles

    Remission Definitions in RA: Common Questions & Implications for Clinical Practice

    May 5, 2022

    A recent editorial provides new insights by reexamining the definitions of remission for rheumatoid arthritis and outlining concerns with the use of specific metrics for remission in clinical trials.

    How Does Health Literacy Affect the Patient Global Assessment?

    May 8, 2019

    For RA patients, a low score on the patient global assessment of disease activity as measured by a visual analog scale (PGA-VAS) is necessary to confirm remission. However, limited patient health literacy combined with the complexity of the scale may result in discrepancies between the PGA-VAS and provider assessments of disease activity. New research examined the patient perspective on the PGA-VAS and its connections to health literacy and disease state…

    Target Remission

    March 1, 2007

    Strategies to identify and track remission in your RA patients

    New Criteria for RA Remission

    February 12, 2011

    ACR and EULAR update 1981 criteria to reflect modern treatment options

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences