Video: Every Case Tells a Story| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

The Good and Bad of Cloned Notes

Staff  |  Issue: April 2012  |  April 6, 2012

Having an electronic heath record (EHR) system in your practice has many benefits, such as Medicare incentives, quality improvement, and increased office efficiencies. Falling in the “office efficiencies” category is the ability to clone notes, which allows you to cut and paste notes from one visit to another. This documentation option for physicians using EHRs puts them at risk for audits.

The Office of Inspector General (OIG) has included in the 2012 Work Plan an assessment of evaluation and management services “to identify electronic health records documentation practices associated with potentially improper payments,” stating, “Medicare contractors have noted an increased frequency of medical records with identical documentation across services.”1

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

It is easy to fall into the trap of cloned notes while using an EHR because the capability to bring forward notes from previous visits can be a great time saver. However, there is a risk that previous notes are not pertinent to the current visit, or that documentation will start to become uniform.

For example, if a history of present illness note is carried over from a previous visit, but the chief complaint and present illness do not match the review of systems the patient filled out, the note is not pertinent to the current visit, raising a red flag for OIG to investigate.

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Cloned notes can lead to unnecessary audits. Medicare carriers and Recovery Auditor Contractors have the authority to pull medical records up to three years old if they suspect any fraud or abuse. Since there has been an increase of identical documentation in medical records, the OIG has intensified their efforts to assess the policies and procedures in place for fraud.

Take some time to perform self-audits or have a consultant audit your practice regularly to ensure that your EHR is coding to the correct level of service. Keep in mind that the EHR is just a tool, and you have ultimate control of the documentation. To protect your practice from falling into the trap of cloned notes, review all the notes that are brought over from a previous visit to ensure that all the information for the current visit is accurate.

Understanding coding and documentation guidelines are your best defense against the bad side of cloned notes. If you need assistance with coding and reimbursement, contact the ACR’s practice management department at (404) 633-3777 or [email protected], or join the ACR coding list serve at www.rheumatology.org/membership and post your questions online.

Page: 1 2 | Single Page
Share: 

Filed under:Billing/CodingEMRsFrom the CollegePractice SupportTechnology Tagged with:BillingCodingEHRelectronic health recordMedicarePractice ManagementTechnology

Related Articles

    Electronic Health Record Documentation Guidelines

    January 19, 2018

    The operations management team in healthcare practices is expected to have an effective coding compliance program in place that is continually evaluated and reevaluated. To accurately assess the program’s effectiveness, several outcome indicators must be measured, including error rates in the provider’s documentation and the electronic health record (EHR). Due to increased scrutiny by the…

    Practice Page: Protecting Your Practice through Compliance

    November 1, 2011

    Compliance programs are an effort by the government to maintain integrity in the healthcare system. These programs target activities causing improper payment to determine their root cause: Was it a mistake or error, was it inefficiency or waste of resources, is the provider bending the rules or abusing the system, or was it intentional deception or fraud? There are also laws dictating the compliance culture within practices and institutions; for example, red-flag rules, antikickback statute, and stark law, to name a few.

    Electronic Health Records Present Communication Challenges for Physicians

    October 1, 2014

    Digitized patient records have transformed how clinicians record, understand clinical information

    Five Most Important Fraud, Abuse Laws Applicable to Physicians

    June 1, 2014

    Know what’s included in the federal False Claims Act, Anti-Kickback Statute and other regulations and guidelines to prevent Medicare abuse

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences