Video: Every Case Tells a Story| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

The Key to Early Rheumatoid Arthritis

Annette H.M. van der Helm-van Mil, MD, PhD, and Tom W.J. Huizinga, MD, PhD  |  Issue: September 2010  |  September 1, 2010

In addition to the new criteria, a prognostic tool for predicting RA development in patients with recent onset UA has been derived. This prediction rule does not alter the current definition of RA and does not primarily classify patients; rather, this rule provides the likelihood of an individual patient’s chance to progress towards RA. The predictive accuracy of this model is widely validated. Although the approaches were different (deriving new classification criteria or a prognostic tool), both efforts were driven by the concept that UA patients with an unfortunate prognosis should be identified early. Hopefully these efforts will lead to improved outcomes for patients with early undifferentiated arthritis and provide the foundation for new treatment strategies directed at achieving remission and preventing disease progress, permanent damage, and disability.

Dr. van der Helm-van Mil is head of the outpatient clinic in the department of rheumatology and Dr. Huizinga is chair of rheumatology, both at Leiden University Medical Center in Leiden, The Netherlands.

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

ACR/EULAR RA Criteria Now Available

The 2010 ACR/EULAR classification criteria for rheumatoid arthritis were published in the September issue of Arthritis & Rheumatism (2010;62:2569-2581) and are available for download at www.rheumatology.org in the Practice Management tab.

References

  1. Banal F, Dougados M, Combescure C, Gossec L. Sensitivity and specificity of the American College of Rheumatology 1987 criteria for the diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis according to disease duration: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2009; 68:1184-1191.
  2. Funovits J, Aletaha D, Bykerk V, et al. The 2010 ACR/EULAR classification criteria for rheumatoid arthritis: Methodological report Phase 1. Ann Rheum Dis. 2010; 69:1589-1595.
  3. Neogi T, Aletaha D, Silman A, et al. The 2010 ACR/ EULAR classification criteria for rheumatoid arthritis: Phase 2 methodological report. Arthritis Rheum. 2010; 62:2582-2591
  4. Aletaha D, Neogi T, Silman A, et al. 2010 Rheumatoid arthritis classification criteria: An ACR/EULAR collaborative initiative. Arthritis Rheum. 2010;62:2569-2581.
  5. Thabet MM, Huizinga TW, van der Heijde DM, van der Helm-van Mil AH. The prognostic value of baseline erosions in undifferentiated arthritis. Arthritis Res Ther. 2009; 11:R155.
  6. Stone R, Coppock JS, Dawes PT, Bacon PA, Scott D. Clinical value of ELISA assays for IgM and IgG rheumatoid factors. J Clin Pathol. 1987;40:107-111.
  7. van der Helm-van Mil AH, le Cessie S, van Dongen H, Breedveld FC, Toes RE, Huizinga TW. A prediction rule for disease outcome in patients with recent-onset undifferentiated arthritis: How to guide individual treatment decisions. Arthritis Rheum. 2007;56:433-440
  8. van der Helm-van Mil AH, Detert J, le Cessie S, et al. Validation of a prediction rule for disease outcome in patients with recent-onset undifferentiated arthritis: Moving toward individualized treatment decision-making. Arthritis Rheum. 2008;58(8):2241-2247
  9. Kuriya B, Cheng CK, Chen HM, Bykerk VP. Validation of a prediction rule for development of rheumatoid arthritis in patients with early undifferentiated arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2009 Sep;68(9):1482-1485.
  10. Tamai M, Kawakami A, Uetani M, et al. A prediction rule for disease outcome in patients with undifferentiated arthritis using magnetic resonance imaging of the wrists and finger joints and serologic autoantibodies. Arthritis Rheum. 2009;61:772-778.
  11. Bradna P, Soukop T, Bastecj D, Hrncir J. Prediction rule in early and very early arthritis patients. Ann Rheum Dis. 2009;68(Suppl 3): 547.
  12. Luchikhina El, Karateev DE, Nasonov EL. The use of prediction rule to predict the development of rheumatoid arthritis in russian patients with early undifferentiated arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2008;58:2241-2247.
  13. Mjaavatten MD, Van der Helm-van Mil AH, Huizinga TW, et al. Validation of a proposed prediction rule for rheumatoid arthritis in a cohort of 188 patients with undifferentiated arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2008;67(Suppl II):477.
  14. van der Linden MP, van der Woude D, Ioan-Facsinay A, et al. Value of anti-modified citrullinated vimentin and third-generation anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide compared with second-generation anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide and rheumatoid factor in predicting disease outcome in undifferentiated arthritis and rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2009;60:2232-2241.

Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 | Single Page
Share: 

Filed under:Clinical Criteria/GuidelinesConditionsRheumatoid Arthritis Tagged with:Diagnostic CriteriaGuidelinesRheumatoid arthritisTreatment

Related Articles

    Désirée Van Der Heijde, MD, PhD, a Key Driver of Treatment Advances

    May 8, 2012

    Dr. van der Heijde learned early in her career that serendipity often plays a role in clinical research and treatment advances.

    Target Remission

    March 1, 2007

    Strategies to identify and track remission in your RA patients

    To Measure is to Know

    October 1, 2007

    Piet van Riel, MD, PhD, shepherd of RA improvement criteria

    Experts Discuss Proposed Giant Cell Arteritis Risk Tool

    April 26, 2018

    A proposed model to predict the risk of giant cell arteritis (GCA) prior to a temporal artery biopsy could help triage patients and guide decision making about the need for biopsy or monitoring (see Figure 1). There’s no specific biomarker for GCA, and GCA can be a “diagnostic conundrum, especially when it presents in an…

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences