Video: Every Case Tells a Story| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring Has Little Value During Infliximab Induction

Reuters Staff  |  May 12, 2021

NEW YORK (Reuters Health)—Results of a randomized controlled trial do not support routine use of proactive therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) during infliximab induction for improving disease remission rates in patients rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and other chronic immune-mediated inflammatory diseases.

Proactive therapeutic drug monitoring tailors biologic therapy to individual patients by measuring serum drug levels and antidrug antibodies (ADAs) and adjusts treatment doses based on the levels, with the goal of maximizing efficacy and safety of biologic drugs.

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Proactive therapeutic drug monitoring has been adopted by some clinicians but whether it improves clinical outcomes when implemented at the time of drug initiation, compared with standard therapy, remains unclear.

To investigate, researchers with the Norwegian Drug Monitoring (NOR-DRUM) trial enrolled 411 patients with RA, psoriatic arthritis, axial spondyloarthritis, psoriasis, or inflammatory bowel disease who were initiating infliximab.

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Patients were randomly allocated to proactive therapeutic drug monitoring or standard care without therapeutic drug monitoring. The results are based on 398 patients—198 in the therapeutic drug monitoring group and 200 in the standard-care group.

The primary endpoint of clinical remission was achieved in 100 (51%) patients in the therapeutic drug monitoring group and in 106 (53%) patients in the standard-care group, with no significant difference between group (adjusted difference, 1.5%; 95% confidence interval, -8.2% to 11.1%), Dr. Silje Watterdal Syversen of Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, and colleagues report in JAMA.1

Adverse events were reported in 135 patients (68%) in the therapeutic drug monitoring group and 139 patients (70%) in the standard therapy group. Eight percent of patients on standard therapy had an infusion-related reaction vs. 3% of the therapeutic drug monitoring group.

The researchers caution that the trial was open label and bias due to lack of double-blinding is possible. Also, the trial did not have statistical power to test hypotheses within each disease subgroup and minimum clinically important differences were not available for all outcomes.

The authors of a related editorial note that although this trial “convincingly demonstrated that in a mixed disease indication population, implementing therapeutic drug monitoring at time of initial induction therapy provided little benefit, it does not rule out potential benefit for patients at high risk for developing ADAs.”2

“Patients with RA, those not receiving concomitant immunosuppression, those who developed ADAs against other [non-infliximab’ monoclonal antibodies, and those with a loss of response (i.e., reactive therapeutic drug monitoring on a case-specific basis, rather than proactive therapeutic drug monitoring in everyone), might still benefit from therapeutic drug monitoring,” write Jeffrey R. Curtis, MD, MS, MPH1, of the University of Alabama at Birmingham and co-authors.

Page: 1 2 | Single Page
Share: 

Filed under:Conditions Tagged with:infliximabinfliximab inductiontherapeutic drug monitoring

Related Articles

    Therapeutic Drug Monitoring May Offer Little Benefit to Patient Remission Rates During Infliximab Induction Therapy

    August 9, 2021

    Although rheumatologists prescribe tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi’s) to treat several rheumatic diseases, they recognize immunogenicity influences the efficacy and safety of TNFi’s. Example: The formation of anti-drug antibodies can affect infusion reactions and cause low-serum drug levels and therapeutic failure. The induction phase is a period of high incidence of immunogenicity, and observational data…

    Anti-Drug Antibodies May Affect RA Treatment

    June 5, 2017

    A recent study examined the level of anti-drug antibodies (ADAs) in RA patients taking the TNF inhibitors adalimumab, infliximab and etanercept. Study patients without ADAs experienced better clinical outcomes, while patients with detectable ADAs had significantly lower serum trough drug concentrations…

    Maintenance of Remission in ANCA-Associated Vasculitis

    September 5, 2012

    Relapses are common, but difficult to predict and prevent.

    Reading Rheum

    July 1, 2007

    Handpicked Reviews of Contemporary Literature

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences