Video: Every Case Tells a Story| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

These Digital Tools Aren’t Just Hype, Can Actually Help Rheumatologists

Thomas R. Collins  |  Issue: February 2019  |  February 18, 2019

Patient Data Collection Tips

Before a practice sets out to collect patient information, it must take a host of factors into account, said Eric Ruderman, MD, associate chief for clinical affairs in rheumatology at Northwestern University in Chicago. If you’re trying to collect information for use in clinical care, physician engagement is one of the most important considerations, he said. It must be a feasible endeavor, and even if it’s only a brief time commitment, its value must be clear to the clinician.

“Though four minutes isn’t a very long period of time, when you have a 20-minute office visit, that’s a big chunk of that office visit,” Dr. Ruderman said. “And if you’re going to disrupt the clinic flow in any way, you’ve got to persuade your providers … the data you’re collecting is meaningful.”

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

He also emphasized these factors:

  • Limit data-collection effort—“You need to reduce the burden on patient and on staff” as much as possible.
  • Determine the extent of the data you want to collect—Limit the complexity of the instruments to what is really necessary, because patients must be willing to participate. Will every patient have data collected every visit? Less often? Only RA patients? Only lupus patients? “We have addressed that in our practice by limiting the number of instruments we use and collecting it on every patient, every visit,” Dr. Ruderman said. “And then if the physician doesn’t find it helpful, it’s extra information. If they do, it’s useful.”
  • Make it understandable—He noted the Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data 3 (RAPID3) disease activity index is used widely because it is simple and easy to understand. But however the data is presented, it must be concise and easy to use in a busy environment.
  • Consider the clinic flow—When should the data be collected? If a patient shows up just a minute or two before their appointment time, there probably won’t be enough time to collect their data without delaying the physician. If it’s collected too far ahead of time, it may not be considered truly real-time data useful at a visit. The same is true if it’s collected afterward. There is no clear answer, Dr. Ruderman said.
  • Monitor the process—Someone in the office must make sure the data collection is happening. This will involve reminding patients to fill out the questionnaire, collecting the information and then bringing it to the physician.

“At the end of the day, integrating all of this is the key piece,” Dr. Ruderman said, “to try to make sure it all goes in one place, so that … in practice, you can use it.”

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Page: 1 2 3 4 5 | Single Page
Share: 

Filed under:Meeting ReportsTechnology Tagged with:2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meetingadherencepatient dataPROMISwearable device

Related Articles

    Is It Time to Replace the HAQ?

    July 12, 2011

    The PROMIS initiative uses item response theory to improve assessment of patient-reported health and wellbeing

    Patient-Centered Care Model for RA Flares Could Improve Self-Management of Symptoms

    December 16, 2015

    A recent trend to incorporate patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in clinical research, and ultimately clinical practice, is a response to the need to better measure and treat what patients truly care about, and adapt to the changing healthcare environment, which increasingly includes patient satisfaction as a key metric for overall quality of care, a metric tied…

    Quality Measures Used to Assess Care, Improve Outcomes in Children, Adults with Rheumatic Diseases

    March 20, 2017

    WASHINGTON, D.C.—In a session during the 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting, aptly called Quality Measures and Quality of Care I, a panel of experts presented information on a number of programs underway in rheumatology using quality measures to both assess and improve patient outcomes. Leading off were two presentations on programs using quality measures to improve…

    Medication Non-Adherence by Rheumatology Patients & What Rheumatologists Can Do

    April 1, 2015

    Lack of efficacy, poor DAS scores may be misinterpreted as a drug failure

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences