Video: Every Case Tells a Story| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

These Digital Tools Aren’t Just Hype, Can Actually Help Rheumatologists

Thomas R. Collins  |  Issue: February 2019  |  February 18, 2019

When patients flared, researchers found, they did indeed walk less.

Predicting Flares

In another talk, Laure Gossec, MD, PhD, professor of rheumatology at Sorbonne University, Paris, discussed the way clinicians and researchers have turned to activity trackers to try to get a better handle on RA patient flares.

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

“They’re important for patients, but also they should be important for physicians,” Dr. Gossec said. “But we haven’t seen yet how we can collect them and make sure we’re not overdefining flares, or missing something. Questionnaires and changes in disease activity status are the usual ways to detect flares, but they don’t always agree.”

Patients’ disease activity can, of course, fluctuate wildly between visits, which provide only a snapshot in time. In a study called ActConnect, researchers turned to activity trackers on the theory that when patients are suffering a flare, they’ll walk less, because patients say activity interruption is an important aspect of their flares. In the study, 170 RA and axial spondyloarthritis patients were asked questions each week to assess flare, and their physical activity was monitored with trackers. Dr. Gossec said patients (who received the devices for free) were compliant in wearing them and in uploading their data regularly with a Bluetooth connection.

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

When patients flared, researchers found, they did indeed walk less. There was a significant link between physical activity and flares (P=0.03). Patients in flare tended to walk roughly 1,000 steps less per day—or about 10–15% below the normal amount of daily activity of those not in flare.

Researchers turned to a commercial source—a phone company interested in venturing into healthcare with a machine-learning angle—to analyze the data with machine learning to try to use the steps walked to predict flare. They came away with a positive predictive value of 91% and a negative predictive value of 99%.2

Dr. Gossec acknowledged the machine-learning process is a bit of a “black box.” It stands to reason, though, that the process likely involves not just the total number of steps, but the pattern of those steps—when they’re taken, skipped exercise days and pace, she said.

She said the results show it is possible to use big data analysis on rheumatology datasets. But it is not a simple proposition.

“If we want to use big data machinery to analyze things like steps per minute, we need expertise,” Dr. Gossec said. “It’s a very specific expertise. It also takes time and money.”

The ultimate use of the data is also a consideration. “Will that information go to the insurance company before it goes to the doctor?” she asked. “These are all issues we need to think about.”

Page: 1 2 3 4 5 | Single Page
Share: 

Filed under:Meeting ReportsTechnology Tagged with:2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meetingadherencepatient dataPROMISwearable device

Related Articles

    Is It Time to Replace the HAQ?

    July 12, 2011

    The PROMIS initiative uses item response theory to improve assessment of patient-reported health and wellbeing

    Patient-Centered Care Model for RA Flares Could Improve Self-Management of Symptoms

    December 16, 2015

    A recent trend to incorporate patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in clinical research, and ultimately clinical practice, is a response to the need to better measure and treat what patients truly care about, and adapt to the changing healthcare environment, which increasingly includes patient satisfaction as a key metric for overall quality of care, a metric tied…

    Quality Measures Used to Assess Care, Improve Outcomes in Children, Adults with Rheumatic Diseases

    March 20, 2017

    WASHINGTON, D.C.—In a session during the 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting, aptly called Quality Measures and Quality of Care I, a panel of experts presented information on a number of programs underway in rheumatology using quality measures to both assess and improve patient outcomes. Leading off were two presentations on programs using quality measures to improve…

    Medication Non-Adherence by Rheumatology Patients & What Rheumatologists Can Do

    April 1, 2015

    Lack of efficacy, poor DAS scores may be misinterpreted as a drug failure

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences