Video: Every Case Tells a Story| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

Tips for Surviving FDA Audits of Your Clinical Trials

Thomas R. Collins  |  Issue: February 2018  |  February 18, 2018

Alfa Photo / shutterstock.com

Alfa Photo / shutterstock.com

SAN DIEGO—You come to work. The day is going well. Your clinical trials are moving along. Then you get the call: It’s the Federal Drug Administration (FDA), and they’re coming to audit in about a week.

You might be struck by a sense of dread. But you don’t have to be, an expert said at the 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting Nov. 3–8. You just have to be prepared.

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

“If you prepare every day, you’re going to be just fine,” said Lisa Kastanek, RN, research coordinator at Nebraska-based Physician Research Collaboration in Lincoln, Neb., a company that helps run clinical trials.

A good place to start: Read and know the FDA’s Compliance Program Guidance Manual. It’s like “the answers to the test,” Ms. Kastanek said. “It gives you a rundown of what they’re looking for, so you can develop a site-readiness plan.”

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Ms. Kastanek also offered these tips for your daily practice to remain prepared for an audit:

  • When preparing documents, adopt the ALCOA approach: attributable, legible, contemporaneous, original and accurate. That means it should be clear who wrote the document; it must be clearly written (Kastanek mentioned dates specifically as a potential legibility problem); the document should be written at the time of the event; the original documents must be available; and the information in them should be correct.
  • Avoid “notes to file.” Documents shouldn’t refer to the file, because “I don’t want them to go have to look somewhere else and find more information about it.”
  • Set up protocols properly with thorough protocol review and identification of protocol discrepancies. “Setup of protocol is very labor intensive, but it’s the most important piece.”
  • It’s especially important to have, and consistently follow, practice standards for key areas, such as informed consent, training, investigational product, quality assurance and data checks. “It’s a whole lot easier to answer FDA questions when you have and follow consistent standards,” Ms. Kastanek said.
  • When preparing for one audit, keep in mind future audits and make adjustments if necessary.
  • Although sponsor audits don’t duplicate FDA audits, they can offer a hint of what the FDA will look for.

It’s a whole lot easier to answer FDA questions when you have & follow consistent standards. —Lisa Kastanek

At the time of the audit, Ms. Kastanek offered these tips:

  • Make sure the person who answers the phone knows where they should route FDA calls.
  • At the time of the call, find out the reason for the audit. Is it an inspection for cause, for example, or a routine audit? And note which regulatory office originated the call—your sponsor might want that information.
  • Establish an inspection team. “We need to make sure everything is organized to a T because the more organized it is, the faster the FDA can review it and the sooner they can [finish].”
  • Delegate one staff member to lead the audit and work with the inspector the entire time. Ms. Kastanek said it’s best to limit the number of people with the auditor, and whoever interacts with the inspector must know everything about their part of the clinical trial.
  • Review every informed consent form with great care. “That means every page of every ICF,” making sure they’re all signed, and that every spot for initials has actually been initialed.
  • Know the details of all serious adverse events and adverse events of special interest, inside and out. “You’ve got to know what happened in those situations.”
  • When answering questions, try to get the auditor to narrow the focus so that you can avoid “an unnecessary, potentially lengthy discussion about the process.” Don’t answer a question if you’re not 100% sure of the answer. And keep answers succinct to avoid going down a rabbit hole.
  • Remain friendly, but remember, the FDA is “not your friend,” and avoid the trap of saying something inappropriate.
  • Set aside an area for the auditor to work that’s away from patient and staff conversations.
  • Stay with the auditors often so that “they themselves don’t answer questions with the wrong answers,” suspecting something is wrong when it’s just a misunderstanding.
  • Use daily wrap-up meetings to address any FDA concerns, and update your sponsor at least once a day.
  • If the auditors issue a Form 483 with suspected violations, make sure you understand the reason so you can provide a response. A response will be required within 15 days.

Last, Ms. Kastanek emphasized the importance of consistency. “Standards driven by regulations, followed every day, are key to inspection success,” she said.

Page: 1 2 | Single Page
Share: 

Filed under:Meeting ReportsPractice Support Tagged with:ACR/ARHP Annual Meetingclinical trialsFDA audit

Related Articles

    Different Payer Audits Require Different Preparation & Response

    June 21, 2018

    For a provider of healthcare services, payer audits are always a possibility. Both government and private payers consistently monitor providers to prevent fraud, overpayment, and improper billing or coding procedures. Audits can be nerve-racking and intimidating, even if a provider is billing correctly. Improper billing can lead to civil and criminal sanctions. To alleviate some…

    What Rheumatologists Need to Know about Payer Audits

    March 15, 2016

    Both government and private payers continue to aggressively monitor providers to prevent and recover overpayments. This is evidenced by the fact that the number of audits conducted in recent years has increased dramatically. A negative audit finding can result in the need to repay five- or seven-figure amounts. Types of Audits Private Payer Audits Private…

    Phase 2 of HIPAA Audit Program Launches

    May 13, 2016

    With many competing priorities facing physician practices, HIPAA compliance and security is not a topic that usually makes it to the top of the list. But this is not the case with the Department of Health and Human Services’ Office for Civil Rights (OCR), because it has initiated a new phase of audits of physician…

    Preparing for Increased HIPAA Audits Among Smaller Rheumatology Providers

    May 13, 2016

    Recent enforcement activities of the Department of Health and Human Services’ Office for Civil Rights (OCR) have shown an increase in fines and penalties assessed against smaller providers for failing to comply with the privacy, security and breach notification requirements of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA). Historically, OCR has focused on larger…

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences