Video: Every Case Tells a Story| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

Tofacitinib Increases Risk of Venous Thromboembolism

Arthritis & Rheumatology  |  Issue: October 2024  |  July 29, 2024

Background & Objectives

The ORAL Surveillance trial (NCT02092467), a postauthorization safety study of tofacitinib in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) aged 50 years or older with at least one additional cardiovascular risk factor, found a dose-dependent increase in venous thromboembolism (VTE) and pulmonary embolism (PE) events when patients were treated with tofacitinib vs. a tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitor. To further our understanding of the VTE events identified in the trial, Charles-Schoeman et al. assessed the incidence of VTE in patients with RA over time. They also explored risk factors of VTE, including disease activity. 

Methods

Patients with RA aged 50 years or older and with at least one additional cardiovascular risk factor received 5 or 10 mg of tofacitinib twice daily or a TNF inhibitor. Post hoc, cumulative probabilities and incidence rates (patients with first events/100 patient-years) by six-month intervals were estimated for adjudicated VTE, deep vein thrombosis and PE. Cox regression models identified risk factors. Clinical Disease Activity Index leading up to the event was explored in patients with VTE.

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Results 

Cumulative probabilities for venous thromboembolism and pulmonary embolism were higher with 10 mg of tofacitinib twice daily, but not 5 mg of tofacitinib twice daily, compared with TNF inhibitor. Incidence rates were consistent across six-month intervals within treatments. Across treatments, risk factors for VTE included prior occurrence of VTE, body mass index greater than or equal to 35 kg/m2, older age (i.e., age 65 years or older) and a history of chronic lung disease. At the time of the event, most patients with VTE had active disease, as defined by Clinical Disease Activity Index.

Conclusions

The cumulative incidence of VTE and PE events was higher with 10 mg of tofacitinib twice daily vs. TNF inhibitor, and the results were generally consistent over time. Across treatments, VTE risk factors were aligned with previous studies in the general RA population. These data highlight the importance of assessing VTE risk factors when considering initiation of tofacitinib or a TNF inhibitor in patients with active RA.

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

For complete details, including source material, refer to the full study.


Excerpted and Adapted From 

Charles-Schoeman C, Fleischmann R, Mysler E, et al. Risk of venous thromboembolism with tofacitinib versus tumor necrosis factor inhibitors in cardiovascular risk-enriched rheumatoid arthritis patients. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2024 Aug;76(8). 

 

Share: 

Filed under:Biologics/DMARDsConditionsDrug UpdatesRheumatoid Arthritis Tagged with:Arthritis & RheumatologycardiovascularTofacitinibvenous thromboembolism

Related Articles

    Updates on JAK Inhibitor Safety, COVID-19 Vaccination in Immunosuppressed Patients & More

    December 7, 2021

    ACR CONVERGENCE 2021—The ACR Convergence 2021 meeting reflected the continued advancement of science and practical research in the field of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Among the most important topics this year in RA was the evolution of the risk-benefit profile of Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors, for which new safety data emerged in a series of related…

    Janus Kinase vs. TNF Inhibitors: The Context for Venous Thromboembolism Risk with RA Treatments

    October 7, 2020

    An observational study found treatment with tofacitinib resulted in only a slightly higher rate of venous thromboembolism than tumor necrosis factor inhibitors in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

    TNF Blockade for SLE

    September 1, 2010

    Reckless approach versus missed opportunity?

    Tofacitinib with Methotrexate Not Inferior to Adalimumab with Methotrexate

    July 13, 2017

    Highlights from the 2017 EULAR Congress MADRID—Tofacitinib (a JAK inhibitor) used with methotrexate (MTX) is not inferior to adalimumab (a TNF inhibitor) plus MTX in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients who’ve had an inadequate response to MTX alone, according to results of a Phase 3B/4 trial presented in a session at the Annual European Congress of…

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences