Video: Every Case Tells a Story| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

Treat-to-Target Decisions and Dilemmas

David S. Pisetsky, MD, PhD  |  Issue: July 2011  |  July 12, 2011

After some thought as I weighed in the balance—three tender and swollen joints versus a DAS of 2.80—I decided to increase the methotrexate to 17.5 milligrams a week. That certainly was not a bold move, but I felt better knowing that I had at least done something that could quell the troubles that may have been brewing in three of the Mr. Jones’ joints.

I like the DAS because I have several years experience with its use and, frankly, I like the convenience of the website. I know that the DAS did not make the grade in the deliberations of the ACR/European League Against Rheumatism committee that has defined remission in RA. Nevertheless, as T2T becomes more of a standard, numerous issues will arise about any of the metrics that are used in research or clinical practice in define disease states. Whether it is the DAS28, DAS44, SDAI, CDAI, HAQ, or RAPID3, uncertainty and ambiguities will abound, starting with the extent of synovitis that is still consistent with a state of remission. We will have to contend with the meaning of joint tenderness and swelling and, trust me, answering the question, “How active has your arthritis been in the last seven days?” is not easy, especially when symptoms fluctuate wildly (“I don’t hurt unless I stand”), and the patient does not appreciate or accept the distinction between pain and inflammation.

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

I am happy that T2T is here to stay, even if an occasional value looks bizarre and will stymie me as I decide whether to increase or decrease an agent or add another therapy. Fortunately, rheumatologists have an increasingly large armamentarium of effective agents to allow target practice (pun intended).

Nevertheless, I have my worries and doubts about relying on existing outcome measures to make important decisions on treatment. Even if the DAS or CDAI provide values with two numbers after the decimal point, how solid—or, to use a popular word, robust—are those values?

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Dear reader, I have a question that has been nagging at me since that day in clinic, and I would like your advice. In increasing Mr. Jones’ methotrexate, did I make the right call? In other words, was I on target? the rheumatologist

Dr. Pisetsky is physician editor of The Rheumatologist and professor of medicine and immunology at Duke University Medical Center in Durham, N.C.

Page: 1 2 3 4 | Single Page
Share: 

Filed under:Education & TrainingOpinionRheuminationsSpeak Out Rheum Tagged with:Diagnosispatient carerheumatologistTreat-to-Target

Related Articles

    Strong Support for Treat-to-Target Strategy in RA Patients

    March 16, 2020

    NEW YORK (Reuters Health)—In daily clinical practice, following a treat-to-target (T2T) strategy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) leads to higher rates of remission compared with not following a T2T strategy, according to a longitudinal analysis of real world data. “The results of the analysis provide direct evidence that following T2T, and particularly sustained T2T,…

    Twenty Questions, Part 1

    February 1, 2007

    What disease scores can teach you about rheumatology

    Readers Answer ‘Twenty Questions’

    April 1, 2007

    The March Rheuminations column, “Twenty Questions, Part 1” inspired many letters from TR readers. Here are just a few of those responses.

    Treat to Target in axSpA

    November 29, 2022

    PHILADELPHIA—Treat to target (T2T) is a common phrase in rheumatology these days—and a welcome one.1 Many of us are familiar with what T2T means in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), but we may be less sure of its meaning in axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA). At ACR Convergence 2022, Alexis Ogdie, MD, associate professor of medicine and epidemiology, University of…

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences