Video: Every Case Tells a Story| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

Twenty Questions, Part 2

David S. Pisetsky, MD, PhD  |  Issue: March 2007  |  March 1, 2007

David S. Pisetsky, MD, PhD

Last month, I told you how my handy DAS-ometer has given me a new, and standardized, look at RA. This month, I want to share my first experience with a new metric: the Health Assessment Questionnaire or HAQ.

For my first patient to get HAQed, I wanted to choose one carefully, especially in a teaching clinic where I could show the added value of a patient-reported outcome. I did not want to be disappointed in my first outing and, like my colleague who wanted to stick a fork in the Disease Activity Score (DAS), join the utensil brigade and stick a fork in the HAQ.

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Enter the Subject

A few weeks ago, one of the house officers rotating on service came to me in my clinic office, a small room with an examining table and a desk with a computer for the EMR. He succinctly presented his case, a particularly challenging therapeutic decision. The patient was in his 50s and had had RA for five years. The DAS was 3-something, but the man was struggling, feeling unable to perform the tasks required of him on his job. In today’s parlance, he had minimal disease activity. In my mind, a biological could be of value for him and I wanted to do an HAQ to help me decide.

I do not keep paper HAQs in my clinic and instead have a small handheld computer. This silvery little box is a combined DASometer and HAQometer but, unfortunately, the screen is small and the letters are composed of broken lines that make the words hard to see. I decided therefore to read the questions to the patient and punch in the responses myself. In that way, I would participate in the process and, as we went through the questions, the house officer would learn the array of activities queried to assess functionality.

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

The house officer, a snappy young man aspiring to be a cath jockey, joined me in the examining room with the patient. The patient had a serious, almost worried, expression but his fingers looked straight and fine. When we shook hands, his grip was firm. We chatted briefly and I then did my joint exam, my DAS almost the same as the house officer’s. I then explained the HAQ to the patient and the rationale for the questions.

“These questions tell us precisely about your function and, in that way, we can determine whether you need more treatment.”

Page: 1 2 3 | Single Page
Share: 

Filed under:OpinionPractice SupportRheuminationsSpeak Out Rheum Tagged with:Diagnostic CriteriaHAQHealth Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ)Practice Managementrheumatologist

Related Articles

    Twenty Questions, Part 1

    February 1, 2007

    What disease scores can teach you about rheumatology

    Readers Answer ‘Twenty Questions’

    April 1, 2007

    The March Rheuminations column, “Twenty Questions, Part 1” inspired many letters from TR readers. Here are just a few of those responses.

    Treat-to-Target Decisions and Dilemmas

    July 12, 2011

    A better understanding of targets can lead to better outcomes down the road

    Letters to the Editor

    June 1, 2007

    Feedback from Our Readers

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences